Skip to content Skip to footer

Chief Justice Roberts Forced to Read Warren’s Question About His Legitimacy

Some Democrats have called on the chief justice to override the GOP’s refusal to call witnesses.

In this screengrab taken from a Senate Television webcast, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts speaks during impeachment proceedings in the Senate chamber at the U.S. Capitol on January 30, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts was forced Thursday night to publicly reckon with the effect that Senate Republicans’ management of the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump is likely having on his own legitimacy.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) submitted a question to the House impeachment managers, which was read by the chief justice, targeting the actions taken by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his party to block efforts to subpoena witnesses.

“At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government,” Roberts read, “does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, or Constitution?”

The question created a “legacy-defining” moment for Roberts, tweeted Leah Greenberg, co-founder of the grassroots political action group Indivisible.

Some Democrats have called on Roberts, in his capacity as the official presiding over the impeachment trial, to override the Republican Party and order documents to be subpoenaed and witnesses to appear at the proceedings, in the interest of having a fair hearing.

Roberts may be forced to break a tie vote on Friday. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is the last remaining Republican who has not stated whether she will join Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and all 47 Democrats in voting to call witnesses. If Murkowski votes in favor of witnesses it would split the chamber 50-50.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is leading the Democratic impeachment managers in arguing the case against Trump, addressed Warren’s question.

While hesitating to endorse Warren’s suggestion that Roberts is abdicating his duty as the nation’s senior-most judge by allowing a trial to proceed without witnesses, Schiff allowed that the proceedings have reflected “adversely” on the U.S. Congress and the nation’s democratic ideals.

“I think that will feed cynicism about this institution,” Schiff said. “We can’t even get a fair trial. We can’t even get a fair shake for the American people… Yes, senator, if they don’t get that fair trial it will just further the cynicism that is corrosive to this institution and to our democracy.”

On social media, some posited that Roberts’s expression directly after reading the question betrayed the chief justice’s view of how the trial has harmed his legitimacy and legacy.

“Yup,” tweeted journalist David Roberts.

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $18,000 before midnight to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?