Following President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address last week, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris suggested that he might not engage in debates with former President Donald Trump in this year’s presidential rematch.
Following the speech, ABC News asked Harris whether Biden, the incumbent Democrat, was preparing to debate with Trump, who is now the presumptive Republican nominee following Nikki Haley’s departure from the primaries.
“We’ll get to that at some point and we’ll deal with that,” she said.
The Biden campaign has stated that whether the two will debate will be decided later in the election season.
Biden himself also hasn’t committed to debating. Speaking to reporters as he was leaving the White House for an event in Philadelphia, Biden said that a back-and-forth with Trump on a debate stage “depends on his behavior,” referring to Trump’s erratic tendency to interrupt and attack his political opponents.
Shortly after Haley’s departure from the race, Trump demanded that he and Biden take part in a debate, as they had during the 2020 election season.
“I am calling for Debates, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE, ANYPLACE!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social website, describing such debates as being “for the good of our country.”
Notably, Trump refused to debate any of his GOP challengers during the run-up to the primaries, even though polling demonstrated that a plurality of Americans wanted to see such a debate. Trump’s demand for debates comes despite his past animosity toward the Commission on Presidential Debates.
In 2022, likely responding to Trump’s dubious claims about the commission being biased, the Republican National Committee (RNC) announced that it was leaving the bipartisan civic group. “We are going to find newer, better debate platforms to ensure that future nominees are not forced to go through the biased CPD in order to make their case to the American people,” then-RNC chair Ronna McDaniel said at the time.
The first debate between Biden and Trump in the 2020 presidential campaign was mocked by critics, touted as the worst debate in modern presidential history, in large part due to Trump’s childish outbursts.
“As somebody who’s watched presidential debates for 40 years, as somebody who’s moderated presidential debates, as somebody who’s prepared candidates for presidential debates, as somebody who’s covered presidential debates, that was the worst presidential debate I have ever seen in my life,” said ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos following the first general election debate that year.
“The president of the United States … was by far responsible for a greater share of the jaggedness at a time when America does not need jagged,” CBS News’s John Dickerson said.
Debates have been found to have little importance in voters choosing who to support in the presidential contest, studies have shown. But Trump’s performance that year — and perhaps allowing a debate or two between him and Biden this year — could help to highlight one of his deepest flaws.
“Trump’s first debate performance was a minor disaster for his polling, but it was also a successful display of the authoritarianism that fires up his base,” said Danny Katch, a socialist and humorist who opined about the debate process for Truthout in 2020.
Katch added that the Commission on Presidential Debates needs to drastically change its format if it wants to become relevant for voters.
“It’s enraging to have to endure Trump’s flagrant violations of the rules both campaigns have agreed to, but the entire structure that produced those rules has for the past 30 years been designed to produce little more than softball questions for candidates to deliver sound bites and corny one-liners,” Katch noted.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.