Skip to content Skip to footer

Biden Says Debate With Trump Will Depend on the GOP Nominee’s “Behavior”

Trump said on his Truth Social page that he is ready for a debate with Biden “anytime, anywhere, anyplace.”

President Joe Biden waves as he walks to Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on July 20, 2022, in Washington, D.C.

Following President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address last week, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris suggested that he might not engage in debates with former President Donald Trump in this year’s presidential rematch.

Following the speech, ABC News asked Harris whether Biden, the incumbent Democrat, was preparing to debate with Trump, who is now the presumptive Republican nominee following Nikki Haley’s departure from the primaries.

“We’ll get to that at some point and we’ll deal with that,” she said.

The Biden campaign has stated that whether the two will debate will be decided later in the election season.

Biden himself also hasn’t committed to debating. Speaking to reporters as he was leaving the White House for an event in Philadelphia, Biden said that a back-and-forth with Trump on a debate stage “depends on his behavior,” referring to Trump’s erratic tendency to interrupt and attack his political opponents.

Shortly after Haley’s departure from the race, Trump demanded that he and Biden take part in a debate, as they had during the 2020 election season.

“I am calling for Debates, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE, ANYPLACE!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social website, describing such debates as being “for the good of our country.”

Notably, Trump refused to debate any of his GOP challengers during the run-up to the primaries, even though polling demonstrated that a plurality of Americans wanted to see such a debate. Trump’s demand for debates comes despite his past animosity toward the Commission on Presidential Debates.

In 2022, likely responding to Trump’s dubious claims about the commission being biased, the Republican National Committee (RNC) announced that it was leaving the bipartisan civic group. “We are going to find newer, better debate platforms to ensure that future nominees are not forced to go through the biased CPD in order to make their case to the American people,” then-RNC chair Ronna McDaniel said at the time.

The first debate between Biden and Trump in the 2020 presidential campaign was mocked by critics, touted as the worst debate in modern presidential history, in large part due to Trump’s childish outbursts.

“As somebody who’s watched presidential debates for 40 years, as somebody who’s moderated presidential debates, as somebody who’s prepared candidates for presidential debates, as somebody who’s covered presidential debates, that was the worst presidential debate I have ever seen in my life,” said ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos following the first general election debate that year.

“The president of the United States … was by far responsible for a greater share of the jaggedness at a time when America does not need jagged,” CBS News’s John Dickerson said.

Debates have been found to have little importance in voters choosing who to support in the presidential contest, studies have shown. But Trump’s performance that year — and perhaps allowing a debate or two between him and Biden this year — could help to highlight one of his deepest flaws.

“Trump’s first debate performance was a minor disaster for his polling, but it was also a successful display of the authoritarianism that fires up his base,” said Danny Katch, a socialist and humorist who opined about the debate process for Truthout in 2020.

Katch added that the Commission on Presidential Debates needs to drastically change its format if it wants to become relevant for voters.

“It’s enraging to have to endure Trump’s flagrant violations of the rules both campaigns have agreed to, but the entire structure that produced those rules has for the past 30 years been designed to produce little more than softball questions for candidates to deliver sound bites and corny one-liners,” Katch noted.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy