Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee reportedly told fellow Congressional Black Caucus members in a private meeting on Wednesday that she will be running to replace California Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein in 2024.
Lee has not publicly announced a run, though sources informed Politico and NBC of her announcement. She later told reporters that she would officially announce her plans “when it’s appropriate,” though she has previously discussed a Senate run with Feinstein and California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Her decision sets up a primary race against Rep. Katie Porter, who announced her Senate campaign on Tuesday, as well as other potential candidates like Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Adam Schiff, who has said that he is “exploring” the idea. Feinstein has not yet announced whether she is stepping down from her seat, though she is expected to do so, especially in light of reports on her declining cognitive health.
A race between Porter and Lee could be contentious. Both are prominent members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), with Porter serving as the deputy chair of the group and Lee as the former co-chair. They also hold similar views on key litmus-test issues for progressives — both have cosponsored legislation for Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, for instance, placing them further to the left than Feinstein.
Feinstein is an establishment Democrat who not only opposes proposals like single payer health care and the Green New Deal, but has actively cast aspersions against these ideas; in 2019, after child climate activists asked her to support the Green New Deal, Feinstein brashly dismissed the young activists’ concerns. The video of the interaction became an infamous symbol of the establishment’s disinterest in taking action that climate advocates and scientists say would match the urgency of the climate crisis.
The California Democrat has provoked the ire of progressives and antiwar activists for her stances on war and militarization, voting to authorize the war in Afghanistan and the Patriot Act in 2001 and being one of 29 Democrats to vote to authorize the Iraq War in 2002. Critics of the left have said in the past that using Feinstein’s Afghanistan vote to criticize her is a farce, as every other member of Congress voted for the war except one.
This is another key area in which Feinstein’s challengers may emerge as notably different, from the left’s perspective. Barbara Lee, then in her second term in the House, was the only member of Congress who voted against the Afghanistan war in the vote just three days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and suffered relentless personal attacks as a result. (Porter was not present in Congress for vote, as she first assumed office in 2019.)
Lee has been consistent in her anti-war advocacy, continually offering amendments to cut the skyrocketing defense budget, calling for an inquiry into the Afghanistan war, and advocating for victims of wars waged by the U.S.
In other areas, however, Lee and Porter have broken away from the most left-leaning members of Congress. On the issue of Israeli apartheid, for instance, both tend to stray away from outright advocating for Palestinians; in 2022, both lawmakers voted to fund Israel’s Iron Dome in a 420 to 9 vote that was met with frustration from many on the left.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.