Progressive House lawmakers have condemned Republicans for voting on Thursday to censure Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-New York), saying the move is little more than political theater after the recent scandals involving now-former Republican Rep. George Santos (New York).
On Thursday, the House voted 214 to 191 to censure Bowman, with three Democrats joining Republicans in voting “yes.” Republicans cited an incident in September when Bowman pulled the fire alarm in the U.S. Capitol office building, separate from the Capitol building, while the House was scrambling to pass a bill to narrowly avoid a government shutdown.
Bowman, who paid a fine for the incident, has said that it was a mistake — he was trying to exit doors that were normally open, and pulled the alarm thinking it would open the doors in his rush to get to the Capitol to cast his vote, he explained in an apology. His insistence that he wasn’t trying to obstruct the bill checks out; Bowman voted with nearly all of his fellow Democrats to pass the bill when the vote eventually resumed, having hardly been affected by the fire alarm at all.
In a debate on the House floor earlier this week, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) said that the GOP was trying to paint over being “embarrassed” by Santos, who was expelled from Congress last Friday after House Ethics Committee investigators found that he “blatantly stole” from his campaign coffers. She said that Republicans were simply “grasping for straws” to find a progressive lawmaker to scapegoat after that debacle.
“Let me tell you what’s actually going on. New York Republicans are so embarrassed that they propped up George Santos, got him elected to office, and then had to turn around and vote to expel him, that they want to distract the entire world from their massive embarrassment,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “So they’ve decided to target one of the first Black men to ever represent Westchester County in the United States Congress for censure.”
“They’re wasting our time, they’re wasting our country’s time,” she said. “These arguments that are being made here — what’s next? Jaywalking? Do you want to get us for jaywalking, for now crossing the street correctly?”
Other progressive lawmakers have also condemned the vote, noting that Republicans have a track record of targeting non-white progressive lawmakers with smear campaigns.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan) pointed out the absurdity of Republicans comparing Bowman to the far right militants who stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Last month, Tlaib, the only Palestinian American in Congress, was censured for her support of Palestinian liberation in the face of Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
“Now you’re trying to shift the focus by baselessly attacking Rep. Bowman to score cheap political points — comparing him to the white supremacists on January 6th who were smashing windows in the Capitol, y’all, and screaming ‘Hang Mike Pence.’ Give me a break,” she said. “This is yet another attempt to silence a person of color in this chamber.”
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Massachusetts) echoed Tlaib, saying, “This censure is just the latest in this chamber’s shameful history of telling Black and brown folks they don’t belong in Congress.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.