In the hours after the U.S. Supreme Court upended affirmative action, which had allowed college admissions boards to consider race when admitting qualified candidates, Wisconsin Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos expressed support for ending diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in the state, including grant programs to help disadvantaged students.
DEI programs allow colleges and universities to invest in activities, speakers, events and clubs that promote diversity and inclusion on campus. Despite experts suggesting that such programs are overwhelmingly beneficial for students of all backgrounds, several Republican-led states across the country have set their sights on defunding or eliminating DEI programs.
Vos is no different: In late June, just hours after the Supreme Court issued its ruling on affirmative action, the Republican lawmaker responded to a tweet that suggested state-funded grants to help students of color with education-related expenses amounted to “discrimination,” saying that bills to end such grants in Wisconsin could come within the next few months.
“We are reviewing the decision and will introduce legislation to correct the discriminatory laws on the books and pass repeals in the fall,” Vos said.
In the days since, Vos has continued tweeting comments condemning DEI and programs to help disadvantaged students.
Vos, for example, retweeted a user who claimed DEI is “profoundly anti-diversity.” On July 4, he claimed that Republicans have always fought for a “colorblind society,” a comment that contradicts historical fact and suggests willful ignorance of systemic racism in the U.S.
In a tweet on Wednesday, Vos claimed that the Court’s ruling “helped end discrimination in university admissions.” Experts have refuted this statement, noting that many universities currently have legacy admission standards that disproportionately benefit white students and that the Court’s decision may result in fewer Black and Latinx students enrolling in colleges or universities.
Vos spent much of this past week defending his views by recounting an incomplete history lesson to critics, stating that more Republicans than Democrats in Congress backed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But his comment ignores the realigning of political parties that took place during the era, as southern Democrats — many of whom were ardent segregationists — later became Republicans who would fight against anti-discrimination measures.
Any proposal in Wisconsin to end grant programs that benefit students of color would likely be blocked by Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat and a former educator who served as the head of the Department of Public Instruction prior to becoming governor. Evers has described calls for eliminating DEI as “short-sighted” and part of a GOP “war on higher education institutions” in the state.
Students in Wisconsin have also decried Vos’s stated goal of ending DEI programs. Uniqua Adams, a student at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, questioned what would happen if Vos’s plans became reality.
“If we’re not going to have DEI, then what are we going to have? Because you can’t just not support students of color,” Adams said to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.