Skip to content Skip to footer

WI Bills Would Require Libraries to Tell Parents What Books Their Kids Check Out

Librarians say the GOP bills would restrict children’s ability to research topics in a safe environment.

A librarian reading aloud to children at table in school library.

Wisconsin Republicans have introduced two bills that would require libraries in the state to inform parents any time their children check out books or materials, a proposal that critics say would be overly burdensome and detrimental to children’s rights and safety.

Senate Bills 597 and 598, authored by Republican Senators Romaine Quinn and Barbara Dittrich, are being promoted as so-called “parental rights” bills.

“This bill puts the parent and/or guardian in the driver seat to have conversations with their children about any materials or themes that they find their child is not ready to be exposed to,” Quinn said during a hearing in the Senate Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children & Families at the state capitol on Tuesday.

But other committee members expressed concern that the bills could lead to restrictions or bans on library materials, citing efforts by conservative parents in several Wisconsin school districts to ban books, particularly those with LGBTQ or racial themes.

The bills are unlikely to pass, as Gov. Tony Evers (D), a former educator, would likely veto them.

The bills would require libraries across the state to inform parents when their children check out books or other materials within 24 hours, and would also require libraries to disclose the titles of those materials. Librarians testifying on Tuesday noted that such a requirement would be incredibly burdensome.

“As there is a [librarian] staffing crisis, and not all schools have a certified full-time librarian, I am concerned that this will require a large amount of administrative time when there is not enough staff right now,” said Emily Dittmar, legislative chair of the Wisconsin Educational Media and Technology Association.

The proposed bills are also redundant, as state law already allows parents to request from libraries what materials their children have checked out if they are under the age of 16.

Critics also expressed worry that the proposals will stifle children’s ability to seek information that restrictive parents may want to withhold from them, including answers to questions about their own identities.

“For so many children that are trying to just seek knowledge, the library has always been a safe place, and now we’re making that an unsafe place because we want to know exactly what it is that they’re reading and exactly what it is that they’re doing,” said Democratic state Sen. LaTonya Johnson.

“Kids should have the freedom to explore all the perspectives and stories that a library has to offer,” Senate Democratic Leader Melissa Agard said on social media. “@SenateDemsWI do not support the efforts of the GOP to stifle learning and limit access to information.”

Madison Public Library Digital Services and Marketing Manager Tana Elias said that parents should take proactive steps in monitoring children’s behaviors if they deem it necessary, rather than relying on librarians.

“I think it’s putting the responsibility that should live with the family on to the schools and the public libraries,” Elias told an NBC affiliate television station in Madison.

Others noted that the bills would put more pressure on libraries to acquiesce to conservative parents’ demands for censorship. In conjunction with demands from far right parents to remove certain titles from shelves — as well as state Republicans pushing for a so-called “Parents Bill of Rights” — the new proposals amount to an “intimidation on librarians and educators, all under the guise of parental rights,” said Kasey Meehan, the Freedom to Read Program Director at PEN America.

Lawmakers should direct their energy elsewhere, said Lucy Ripp, communications director for A Better Wisconsin Together.

“Instead of spending time and resources on real issues facing Wisconsin families and students, like making child care more affordable or ensuring Wisconsin schools are fully funded, state Republicans are continuing their efforts to meddle in personal and educational decisions they have no business in — this time with a bill that unjustly scrutinizes school libraries, imposes unwarranted burdens on local librarians, and impedes upon Wisconsin students’ freedom to read,” Ripp said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy