Washington – Blessed with sound-bite sensibilities in an all-male scrum of long-winded gray suits, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi stood out in Washington this week as the unofficial spokeswoman for the 26 states that challenged the health care law to the Supreme Court.
Elected in 2010, the telegenic former state prosecutor and former Fox News legal commenter inherited the lawsuit from former Republican state Attorney General Bill McCollum. But Bondi campaigned on the issue herself, and she has seized it as her own since taking office at the beginning of last year.
Beaming on Wednesday after the historic three-day arguments in front of the Supreme Court, Bondi said she thought it went “very well, once again.” And she insisted that Florida’s opposition to the signature achievement of President Barack Obama’s administration is on constitutional, not political, grounds.
“As attorneys general, we keep going back to the constitutionality, because that’s our job,” she said. “We’re not here to debate health care policy. It’s all about the Constitution and following the law.”
Although Bondi also has tackled pill mills in Florida and a number of other initiatives, the health care case has consumed her staff since she took office. She served on the executive committee that chose attorney Paul Clement to argue the case in front of the high court; as the case approached oral arguments, there were as many as three conference calls a week on its status.
One deputy, Tim Osterhaus, was so committed to seeing the arguments that he bought a sleeping bag and camped out in a special line for attorneys outside the Supreme Court the night before the justices tackled the question of individual mandates.
Bondi’s predecessor filed the lawsuit in March 2010, minutes after President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law. Bondi helped persuade an additional six state attorneys general to join the suit.
Bondi emerged naturally as their spokeswoman, in part because Florida was the lead plaintiff in the case, said South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, who, like his Florida counterpart, had a predecessor who took an early and aggressive interest in challenging the federal government on health care.
Also? “She’s the best-looking face of us all,” Wilson said.
A registered Democrat from 1984 until she switched to the Republican Party in 2000, she wasn’t especially politically involved until she ran for office. Bondi, 46, downplays suggestions that the health care lawsuit may have raised her profile — and as a result, her future prospects in the Republican Party.
“I don’t care about that,” she said. “I care about defeating the health care mandate. That’s all I care about.”
She repeated her talking points: The legal challenge was about the Constitution, not politics.
“When we were in front of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, everyone kept saying it was about politics. ‘You don’t stand a chance of winning, because you have two Clinton appointees and one Bush appointee on your panel,'” Bondi said. “And we ended up with the best bipartisan decision in the country. So it’s not about politics, it’s about the Constitution. And that’s what we firmly believe.”
Among her fellow Republican attorneys general as they recapped this week’s arguments with daily press conferences, Bondi served as their emcee and chief spokeswoman. And Bondi had the politics nailed. She introduced Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning as “our next United States senator” and pledged that health care would have to go back to Congress for a rewrite.
“When they do go back to the drawing board — and I firmly believe they will have to — I think everyone will read the law at that point. Seriously!” she said, in a dig at the 2,700-page legislation. “Next go-around, they’re going to be much more thoughtful, much more cautious.”
Bondi doesn’t discount the need for health care reform in the United States, however. Among her talking points on the issue is a standard disclaimer that it’s an issue desperately in need of addressing. Just follow the Constitution, she says.
“I would be the first one to say we need tremendous health care reform,” she said. “But this is not the way to do it.”
Leaving a final press conference with several Republican senators, fellow attorneys and former presidential candidate Michele Bachmann, Bondi walked toward the car that was taking her back to the airport and her duties in Tallahassee.
She stopped to take a wistful look at the Supreme Court building.
“Can you take my picture in front of it?” she asked her staff.
© 2012 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy