A quarterly report published on Tuesday detailed tumult in Afghanistan, amid uncertainty over the Trump administration’s approach to America’s longest-running war.
Afghan security forces suffered thousands of casualties in the first few months of this year, according to the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). Between January and May, 2,531 were killed and another 4,238 were wounded in action.
Although Afghan forces suffered roughly the same number of casualties in the same time frame in 2016, this year’s number involved fewer losses from “planned offensive operations,” SIGAR noted. The struggle for control between the Taliban and government forces remains largely unchanged, with 119 national districts contested.
The report comes days after The Wall Street Journal revealed that the White House is considering replacing the 8,500-strong US contingent in Afghanistan with private contractors.
President Trump had previously been weighing the deployment of an additional 3,000-4,000 personnel to Afghanistan. The White House had been pushing the Pentagon to rely more heavily on private contractors after military officials called for the additional troops, according to The New York Times.
The US military is in Afghanistan in an “advise and assist” capacity. Congress has allocated $714 billion to the war since it started in 2001.
Although similar Afghan casualty rates in late 2014 led a senior US military official to declare that the trend was “not sustainable,” Afghan forces are growing in size. The latest figures available show that the country’s police and military added more than 16,000 members in the previous year, to swell overall personnel numbers to 336,042.
That figure does, however, include “ghost” soldiers — phony servicemembers registered so someone can draw their salary. According to SIGAR, there are 12,703 staffers within the Ministry of Defense, or 7 percent of the body’s entire payroll, who are “unaccounted for.”
Corruption is also rampant in other regards. Tuesday’s report detailed zero progress, in recent months, in efforts to recover the nearly $1 billion that was stolen from Kabul Bank; a theft that led to the institution’s collapse, in 2010.
“Some debtors appear to be shielded by their close ties to former and current high-level government officials,” SIGAR noted.
The report mentioned Abdul Ghafar Dawi, a former bank shareholder and oil executive, who was arrested earlier in the year, accused of embezzling millions of dollars. “Dawi was freed this quarter without repercussion,” SIGAR said.
In September 2014, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani ordered the recovery of money stolen from Kabul Bank. Since then, only $32.6 million in additional cash has been recovered.
Money that remains hidden includes hundreds of millions of dollars connected to Kabul Bank’s former CEO, Khalilullah Ferozi, and its ex-chair, Sherkhan Farnood. “Their assets are hidden under other people’s names,” SIGAR said, citing input from the Justice Department. Ferozi is only required to serve his prison sentence at night.
Some of the money stolen from Kabul Bank might be in the US. The Afghan government had asked DOJ for assistance in April 2015, but the request was considered “legally deficient” by US officials.
Justice “outlined the corrective actions needed to move forward,” SIGAR noted, but the Afghans were unresponsive “and the case was closed this quarter.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.