Skip to content Skip to footer

Warren: Jerome Powell Should Recuse Himself From Bank Probe for Role in Failure

The Silicon Valley Bank failure was caused in part by deregulation pushed by Powell, Warren says.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell arrives to a hearing with the House Committee on Financial Services on Capitol Hill on March 8, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) is calling for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to recuse himself from his agency’s investigation into the Silicon Valley Bank failure because his actions directly contributed to the collapse, she says.

The Federal Reserve announced on Monday that it is opening up a review into the “supervision and regulation” of Silicon Valley Bank after the bank failed on Friday, triggering fears of more widespread damage to the economy. The investigation will be led by Vice Chair for Supervision Michael S. Barr, the agency said, and its findings will be released by May.

Warren said that Powell — a holdover from the Trump administration that President Joe Biden renominated when he took office — should not be involved in the probe. “Fed Chair Powell’s actions to allow big banks like Silicon Valley Bank to boost their profits by loading up on risk directly contributed to these bank failures,” Warren said in a statement on Tuesday.

“For the Fed’s inquiry to have credibility, Powell must publicly and immediately recuse himself from this internal review. It’s appropriate for Vice Chair for Supervision Barr to have the independence necessary to do his job,” she continued.

The senator has been outspoken about the failure of Silicon Valley Bank. In an op-ed published in The New York Times on Monday, she pinned the blame for the failure on deregulation of banks, as carried out by Congress, former President Donald Trump and the Federal Reserve. Because of the rollback of post-2008 recession Dodd-Frank regulations that could have prevented the bank collapse, she said, the public will now pay the price with the government bailout of large depositors at the bank.

“In 2018, the big banks won. With support from both parties, President Donald Trump signed a law to roll back critical parts of Dodd-Frank. Regulators, including the Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, then made a bad situation worse, ‌‌letting financial institutions load up on risk,” Warren wrote.

She further said that his position of favoring deregulation of smaller banks “has put our economy at risk, and it needs to end — ‌now.”

Warren is one of many people in the progressive sphere pointing to deregulation as a major reason behind the bank’s collapse, though few people have singled out Powell the way Warren has.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has also pointed to the 2018 repeal of Dodd-Frank regulations as the “direct” culprit of the collapse, noting that Dodd-Frank was put in place precisely to avoid situations like the Silicon Valley Bank failure. “Have we learned nothing?” he asked during the debate over the repeal years ago.

The American Prospect’s David Dayen pointed out in a recent column that the 2018 bill not only nixed regulatory safeguards for small- to medium-sized banks, it also allowed the Federal Reserve, then under Powell, to even further weaken the rules for medium-sized banks like Silicon Valley Bank.

“In 2019, using this tailoring provision like Republican supporters of the law urged, [the Fed] removed the ‘modified Liquidity Coverage Ratio’ from banks under $250 billion (like SVB), a similar kind of emergency measure as in the enhanced regulatory standards,” Dayen wrote. “Then-Fed governor Lael Brainard condemned this ‘reduction in core resilience.’”

Though not directly related to criticism over regulatory repeal, Powell’s relentless quest to hike interest rates — which has been criticized by economists from across the political spectrum — over the past year also contributed to the failure of the bank. Silicon Valley Bank, unlike most other major banks, invested a large amount of its cash into Treasury and mortgage-backed securities which fell sharply in value as Powell began raising interest rates.

Warren has been critical of Powell throughout his tenure. In recent months, she has spoken up about Powell’s raising of interest rates, which economists say disproportionately hurt the working class by depressing jobs and risking a recession.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.