Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) has called for the implementation of stricter ethics rules governing Supreme Court justices after explosive testimony from a former conservative activist revealed that certain right-wing justices had maintained close relationships with conservative evangelical groups over the course of decades.
On Thursday, evangelical minister Robert Schenck testified before the House Judiciary Committee about “Operation Higher Court” — a campaign that his former group, Faith and Action, ran for over two decades in order to gain influence within the Supreme Court.
In recent weeks, Schenck, who says he no longer agrees with the group’s actions, has detailed the anti-abortion group’s strategy to wine and dine right-wing Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia in hopes of securing decisions in line with conservative evangelical interests.
“Our overarching goals were to gain insight into the conservative justices’ thinking and to shore up their resolve to render solid, unapologetic opinions,” Schenck said before the House last week.
Sharing an article about the hearing on Saturday, Warren tweeted, “The Supreme Court needs a strong code of ethics. I’ve got a bill for that.”
The most stunning allegation brought forth by Schenck is that, in 2014, Faith and Action sent a couple to have dinner with Alito — a dinner during which Alito would leak the decision of a landmark Supreme Court ruling that would not become public for weeks.
This alleged leak concerned Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, in which justices decided that employers like Christian company Hobby Lobby have the religious right to deny coverage of birth control to employees. The insider knowledge reportedly allowed Hobby Lobby and evangelical activists to prepare a public relations response to the decision.
Schenck’s allegation of the leak bears strong ties to the leak of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson earlier this year, in which far right justices decided to overturn decades of precedent set under Roe v. Wade. As legal commentators have pointed out, both cases regard topics of reproductive rights that right-wing evangelical activists have fought against for decades, and both leaks appeared to empower those very activists in their fight.
Warren has continually spoken up about the Supreme Court’s lack of a binding ethics code. High Court justices are the only federal judges who aren’t bound to ethics rules; though there are such guidelines for the Supreme Court, there is nothing legally stopping justices from breaking them, and the Court essentially runs on what Warren has referred to as an “honor system.”
In May, Warren and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington) introduced a bill that would ensure that justices have to adhere to the Supreme Court’s Code of Conduct and that would implement other anti-corruption measures like preventing justices from being able to trade individual stocks or receive certain types of gifts.
Though government watchdogs have been calling for such anti-corruption reforms for years, the calls have grown stronger in recent months as public trust in the Supreme Court reaches record lows — and as it appears that right-wing Supreme Court justices are increasingly acting as activists, government watchdogs say.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.