New polling indicates that, the more voters learn about J.D. Vance, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s choice for vice president, the less likely they are to support him.
A Data for Progress poll conducted July 17-18 — days after Vance was announced as Trump’s running-mate — found that 3 in 10 voters said they hadn’t heard enough about the GOP senator from Ohio to form an opinion on him. The remainder of respondents were split in their opinions on Vance, with 35 percent saying they viewed him favorably and 35 percent saying they had an unfavorable opinion.
Although he’s a member of the U.S. Senate, Vance is a relative unknown even among voters of his own political party. But voters tend to sour on him quickly when presented with more information about his past statements.
The Data for Progress poll also asked voters to agree or disagree with a number of statements Vance has made in the past. Voters, for example, were asked whether they agreed with Vance’s statement declaring that the elimination of abortion “is first and foremost about protecting the unborn,” with only 39 percent agreeing with that idea and 53 percent disagreeing.
Vance is vehemently against abortion rights, although he tried his best to conceal his record from the public during his Republican National Convention speech last week.
“The [2020] election was stolen from Trump,” Vance once errantly claimed. Only 34 percent of voters — mostly conservatives and mostly Republican — agreed with that statement, with 56 percent disagreeing.
Respondents in the poll also disagreed with Vance’s false and xenophobic claim that the Biden administration was trying to “punish people” for not voting for the current president by opening up the border for migrants to easily pass through. Nearly 6 in 10 voters (58 percent) disagreed with that statement.
Voters also disagreed with Vance’s comment in defense of Trump’s stated goal of firing any government employee who is disloyal to him should he win the election later this year. “Trump should… fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state,” Vance has said — 60 percent of respondents disagreed with this statement, the poll found.
Attacks against Vice President Kamala Harris, who is now the presumptive nominee for Democrats in the 2024 presidential race, were also rejected by voters. Vance described Harris years ago in disparaging terms due to her being childless, describing her as a “cat lady” who is “miserable.”
When asked if they backed Vance’s declaration that the country is being run “by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives” and who “want to make the rest of the country miserable too,” only 30 percent of voters agreed with Vance while 56 percent disagreed, the poll showed.
The Data for Progress poll is consistent with other surveys showing that many voters are still unsure about the GOP vice presidential nominee due to his lack of household name recognition. An Economist/YouGov poll, for instance — some of which was conducted before Vance was selected for the ticket — found that one in two voters (48 percent) said they didn’t know enough about him to say whether they had a favorable view. Among those who believed they did know enough, 31 percent said they had an unfavorable view while only 22 percent said they had a favorable one.
Vance and the Trump campaign are likely aware that his views will not help them politically — during his Wednesday night acceptance speech last week at the Republican National Convention, Vance didn’t discuss any of his far right beliefs on reproductive rights, even though he has said in the past that he supports a total national abortion ban. He also softened his Christian nationalist rhetoric, portraying himself as a mere Christian in support of religious liberty rather than a lawmaker who thinks that his religious beliefs should be codified.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.