Skip to content Skip to footer

J.D. Vance RNC Speech Rewrites History, Downplays Anti-Abortion Views

The GOP vice presidential nominee also spewed anti-immigrant rhetoric, prompting the audience to chant “send them back."

Republican vice-presidential nominee J.D. Vance speaks during a fundraising event at Discovery World on July 17, 2024, on the third day of the Republican National Convention in downtown Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

On Wednesday evening, Ohio Republican Sen. J.D. Vance addressed a crowd of Republicans at his party’s national convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, giving his first formal speech as the vice presidential nominee running alongside former President Donald Trump.

Noticeably — and perhaps strategically — absent from Vance’s speech at the convention was any mention of his anti-abortion and Christian nationalist views.

The evening was officially billed as being about foreign policy, but Vance, having just been nominated as Trump’s running-mate earlier this week, spoke on myriad issues. Many of his claims, mostly targeting the Biden administration, were misleading or blatantly false, while other statements tread a thin line.

At one point in his speech, Vance peddled the false, anti-immigrant talking point that undocumented people are driving up housing costs, prompting the RNC audience to erupt into chants of “send them back”; at another, he praised his spouse’s parents, who immigrated to the U.S. decades ago.

Vance then demanded that any “newcomers” in the U.S. conform to some undefined standard of Americanism. “When we allow newcomers into the American family, we allow them on our terms,” he said.

Vance also wrongly claimed that the Biden administration has led the U.S. away from being “energy independent.” In reality, oil production in the U.S. — which is rapidly accelerating the global climate crisis — has never been higher than under President Joe Biden.

On that same topic, Vance derided Biden for pushing for more green energy jobs in the future, calling the president’s plan to fund such jobs a “green new scam.” More than a quarter of a million green energy-related jobs have been created during Biden’s term in office so far.

In a short aside during his speech, Vance encouraged unsafe gun practices, celebrating how his grandmother stored loaded weapons in unlocked places throughout her home. (Notably, unintentional firearm fatality is a leading cause of death among children in the U.S.)

Vance also used his speech to rewrite history, claiming that Trump had opposed the war in Iraq while Biden had supported it. In fact, both Biden and Trump had openly stated their support for the war when it began, shifting their stance only after public opinion turned against the occupation years later.

Vance’s extremist stance on abortion was markedly absent from his speech, despite his repeated calls for a federal abortion ban when he was running for senator in 2022.

“I certainly would like abortion to be illegal nationally,” Vance said in a radio interview at the time, adding that he could understand the far right argument that such a ban was needed in order to deny residents of states with severe abortion restrictions the ability to cross state lines to obtain the procedure.

Like other Republicans — including Donald Trump — Vance appears to be strategically concealing his anti-abortion agenda because it is unpopular with the American public. Indeed, his website, where he once called for “eliminating abortion” completely, appears to have been wiped from the Internet as of Wednesday morning.

Overall, Vance’s speech played up his working-class childhood while ignoring his ties to billionaires like Peter Thiel, who has backed Vance financially for years in both the private sector and in his run for the Senate. Vance also tampered down his ordinarily over-the-top MAGA-esque rhetoric, and probably for good reason: Most of the U.S. public currently knows very little about him, and revealing the “real” J.D. Vance may give voters the impression that he is a carbon copy of Donald Trump.

Indeed, while recent polling shows that more voters have a negative view of the GOP vice presidential candidate than a positive one, a plurality of voters admit to knowing little about him. An Economist/YouGov poll published the same day Vance gave his speech found that only 24 percent of registered voters have a favorable view of him, while 35 percent see him in a negative light. Nearly half of voters (48 percent) said they didn’t know enough to form an opinion.

Vance’s speech largely succeeded in concealing who he is from the American public, political pundits noted.

“He put a very friendly face on a pretty disturbing agenda,” said CNN’s Van Jones.

“Vance is known for his fiery defenses of Trump on TV. He’s not really using this speech tonight to showcase that side of his political persona,” said The New York Times’s Jess Bidgood.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.