Part of the Series
Voting Wrongs
Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.
Nearly a third of the seats in Congress currently held by members of the Congressional Black Caucus could be at risk due to a recent Supreme Court ruling upending aspects of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), a new analysis has found.
In late April, the conservative-led Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision along partisan lines, ruled against enforcement mechanisms used by some lower courts requiring states to draw Black-majority districts to comply with Section 2 of the VRA. Prior to the high court’s ruling, such mechanisms were seen as a way to ensure that states couldn’t disenfranchise Black voters.
In a dissent to the majority’s decision, Justice Elena Kagan noted that, under the new standard established by the court, “a State can, without legal consequence, systematically dilute minority citizens’ voting power.” Kagan further described the ruling as the “latest chapter in the [conservative] majority’s now-completed demolition of the Voting Rights Act.”
As a consequence of that ruling, up to 19 Democratic lawmakers within the 62-member Congressional Black Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives could be removed from office this year or in the next few years, an analysis from ABC News concluded — not necessarily because constituents disagree with their views or want better alternatives, but because state legislatures could redistrict congressional boundaries to help Republican candidates win instead.
Several states are planning to redraw or have already redrawn their congressional maps to reflect the new standards of the Louisiana v. Callais decision in time for this year’s midterms, while others may end up waiting until 2027 or 2028 to redraw maps for the latter year’s elections.
Among the lawmakers at risk of losing their seats because of mid-census redraws are longtime stalwarts of the House like Rep. James Clyburn, a Democrat who has represented a district from South Carolina since 1993.
Clyburn responded last week to the Republican plan to draw him out of office by saying GOP lawmakers had just one goal in mind: “eliminating the state’s only Democratic House district that is occupied by a Democrat.”
“Republicans are trying to break apart South Carolina’s 6th District. Not because voters demanded it, but because Donald Trump requested it,” he added.
This past week, South Carolina Republicans sought to extend their legislative session in order to redraw maps. Democratic state senators, joined by a few Republicans, blocked that motion, effectively delaying the redistricting plan.
However, earlier this week, Gov. Henry McMaster (R) issued an executive order calling for a special legislative session, calling lawmakers back to Charleston to move the process ahead. The move has the endorsement of President Donald Trump, who on Monday had called on Republicans in the state to “BE BOLD AND COURAGEOUS” by redrawing their maps.
Barring any unexpected blockage of the special session, Clyburn, the lone Democratic member of South Carolina’s House delegation (as well as the only Black Representative), will likely see his 6th Congressional District seat gerrymandered in such a way that Republicans will end up winning it, diluting Black voting power in order to achieve that end. The redraw would result in a 7-0 Republican majority delegation, versus the 6-1 majority they currently have.
Although South Carolina is considered a deeply Republican state overall, it is not entirely Republican, as over 40 percent of residents voted for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election, and nearly the same percentage voted for the Democratic candidate in its most recent gubernatorial race.
As a result of its disproportionate congressional delegation favoring the GOP, the Gerrymandering Project gives South Carolina an “F” rating for how its maps are currently drawn. The state would likely retain that rating if the new maps are passed.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
As Google plans to roll out its new AI search bar, providing shoddy AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site, the consequences promise to be even more explosive. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which 27 percent of our readers find us. If even half of that 27 percent disappears, it will have a devastating impact on our journalism.
The entire journalism ecosystem will shoulder this blow, particularly independent publishers and news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations. If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the inevitability of Big Tech’s AI takeover. Please give today.