In the leadup to this week’s Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the Republican National Committee met behind closed doors with unusually strict security to finalize the wording of their party platform. For the first time in decades, the platform approved at the secret meeting omitted any specific reference to a national abortion ban.
Corporate media outlets have reported on the change as an indication of a “softening” on abortion access and have also covered what they frame as significant pushback from more extreme anti-abortion advocates. However, the rhetoric used in the platform, which Republican National Convention delegates voted to adopt on July 15, indicates that any portrayal of the GOP as having adopted a seemingly moderate stance on abortion rights should be met with skepticism by reproductive justice advocates.
Legal experts have argued that in reality, the platform clearly indicates a preparedness to move forward with national abortion restrictions that go far beyond the states’ rights approach that Republicans pushed during the decades when Roe v. Wade prevented states from enacting outright abortion bans.
The new platform language, which Republican nominee Donald Trump was directly involved in editing, has been reported as a reflection of his public stance that abortion should be legislated at the state level. However, the platform states that “the 14th Amendment … guarantees that no person can be denied Life or Liberty without Due Process, and that the States are, therefore, free to pass Laws protecting those Rights.” The reference to the 14th Amendment reflects legal reasoning that lays the groundwork for a nationwide total abortion ban.
The implications of this strategy are significant: by using a constitutional rights-based framework arguing that the protections guaranteed by the 14th Amendment apply before birth, this legal reasoning could result in a complete abortion ban across all states and could simultaneously invalidate pro-abortion legal arguments that similarly make claims about the constitutional rights of pregnant people to decide to end pregnancies. Although the platform appears to argue that states should be allowed to self-determine their own abortion laws, in reality, this legal reasoning would support a federal abortion ban starting at conception across the United States.
It is important to consider the platform within the context of the Republican Party’s history of strategically (and often misleadingly) drafting its rhetoric about abortion. Over the last 50 years, the Republican Party has often downplayed the extreme nature of the abortion policies its members use to rouse their base.
Conservative political strategists in the U.S. have long utilized abortion as a tool to galvanize support among white voters as a cornerstone of their appeal to social conservatism, especially in the 1970s, when politicians could no longer openly support racial segregation to maintain their economic and political power.
Today, conservative organizations and advocates are aware that abortion restrictions are generally unpopular across the political spectrum and across religious groups. Recent polling by AP/NORC indicates abortion rights are more popular now than they were before Roe v. Wade was overturned, with 6 in 10 adults saying abortion should be legal for any reason. Another recent poll found four out of five people believe abortion “should be managed between a woman and her doctor, not the government.”
By removing specific language from the party platform referring to specific gestational limit, and instead leaning into vague anti-abortion statements like “We proudly stand for families and Life,” the Republican Party is attempting to cater to a wider range of positions.
Voters with more extreme anti-abortion views can feel confident that the lavishly funded politicians and organizations that share their views will continue to successfully influence the Trump administration should Trump be elected in November. Those forces played a role in Trump’s first term, when he nominated three Supreme Court justices crucial to the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision that upended legal access to abortion for millions of people across the United States.
Mike Pence, Trump’s former vice president, released a statement that was widely reported by media outlets as an example of criticism of the new Republican platform from the party’s own leaders. Pence called the platform a “profound disappointment,” describing it as an example of the party “trying to remain vague for political expedience.” However, the politically expedient and strategic vagueness on abortion that Pence is complaining about is the Republicans’ key to opening the door to increasingly severe abortion restrictions.
Framing such statements from prominent anti-abortion advocates as tension within the party overlooks the Republican Party’s pattern of enacting carefully coordinated strategies focused on increasing their power and influence in the long term. What may appear to be pushback from anti-abortion hardliners can instead be understood as efforts to covertly push the public, politicians and policies continually further to the right on abortion while the Republican Party itself can ostensibly hold a more moderate stance to appeal to swing voters. Some anti-abortion advocates openly celebrated the changes as an opportunity to introduce a national ban into the party’s portfolio that is even more restrictive than the 15-week ban many were expecting to be included in the final platform, while others applauded the strategic nature of the platform changes.
The ambiguity that defines the new Republican Party platform’s stance on abortion is what Mary Ziegler, law professor and abortion historian, argues is the main strategy that Trump employs pertaining to abortion: “Confuse everyone, at all times, as much as possible,” including via “a platform that can convince the most committed anti-abortion activist and a swing voter alike that you actually agree with them.”
His choice of Sen. J.D. Vance as a running mate supports this narrative, as Vance has been similarly inconsistent in his statements about abortion. Within one day of Trump’s announcement that Vance would be his pick for vice president, the Vance campaign website removed a page detailing his hardline anti-abortion views, indicating attempts to shift perceptions of Vance’s positions on abortion to align with the language in the party platform. By keeping their abortion discourse as vague as possible, Trump and his allies can create the illusion that no matter what, they always believe whatever is most politically convenient.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $145,000 in one-time donations and to add 1489 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy