Skip to content Skip to footer

Under a Shroud of Secrecy and Security, ALEC Conference Gets Underway

“My 5th ALEC conference started like the others – under a shroud of secrecy and security.”

My 5th ALEC conference started like the others – under a shroud of secrecy and security.

The night before, I attempted to register at the host hotel, only to be told by hotel staff that they were under strict orders not to give out any information about ALEC to anyone who wasn’t staying at the hotel (I wasn’t). Though ALEC is known for trying to slide under the radar, this level of secrecy exceeded previous efforts. As I left, I noticed a police car outside.

And before I ducked out of the conference the next day, a security officer guarding the back door of the hotel warned me to take off my ALEC name tag, which must be worn at all times during the conference.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with ALEC, or the American Legislative Exchange Council, it is the most formidable right-wing policy machine in the United States.

ALEC is a three-legged stool consisting of state legislators, corporations and right wing think tanks that come together to push pro-corporation policies to maximize corporate profits, drive down workers’ wages and privatize everything.

The two big lightening rod topics at ALEC continue to be education and energy issues, with the two biggest ALEC enemies being public schools and the EPA.

When ALEC’s corporate members and conference sponsors include American Electric Power and the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, you can bet that any efforts to reduce coal consumption would get serious push back.

And indeed, the proposed EPA carbon emission rules, designed to curb carbon pollution from coal fired power plants, have sent ALEC pro-coal members into a tizzy as they scramble to figure out how many “grannies will lose their heat” (which they haven’t been able to figure out). The issue has also spun them into rare quandary about political and legal strategies, with many differing opinions on state responses.

But one thing they agree on is that the EPA actions are tantamount to “extortion and blackmail” on states. There was a particularly strong call to arms for legislators to get their Attorney Generals to join a lawsuit against the rules.

Like the ALEC petri dish Wisconsin has become, the majority Republican Wisconsin legislature even one-upped them and gave Attorney General Brad Schimel new positions which Schimel plans to allocate to the cause. One model ALEC bill that is the topic of discussion in the next few days is allowing states to create an “Environmental Impact Litigation fund” which could take corporate donations to fight federal environmental legislation and regulations.

As if not to be undone, public education provokes as strong of ALEC ire as the EPA.

Their strategy on privatizing public education continues to evolve, and is now more focused on co-opting middle-income families by convincing them that public schools are failing their children.

Charter schools seem to be the current craze, perhaps because their private school voucher scheme, directed at low-income children, failed to increase academic performance as they promised. ALEC thinks they have their answer in the independent charter school scheme, which creates another school system that is publicly funded but unaccountable to any elected body and has no regulation or public oversight.

We saw a mini charter school scheme in the latest Wisconsin budget, where the UW Regents and the Waukesha County Executive were given the power to authorize entities allow private charter schools to operate that received public monies.

And ALEC is working on a bigger, more comprehensive model bill on the issue but two corporate ALEC members, virtual school king K12 (another conference sponsor) and the National Alliance for Public Charter schools (the representative who remarked about how active his group has been in Wisconsin) were having a rare public disagreement on the details.

They were told to go off and work on it before the upcoming education Taskforce meeting.

Despite all of the rhetoric about the liberals threatening ALEC’s very existence, during lunch they touted their influence in state legislatures, the halls of Congress with 86 sitting members of Congress and 13 Senators former ALEC members, and even in the current Republican presidential primary, where four candidates, including Scott Walker, are former ALEC members.

Since the tea party wave in 2010, the liberals hadn’t slowed them down, as evidenced by not just the cookie cutter ALEC laws passing state legislatures across the country, but by the proliferation of ALEC policy makers at the highest levels of government.

Now that is truly something to be afraid of.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.