A judge in the United Kingdom has blocked an extradition request from the U.S. to transport Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, to face espionage charges.
Judge Vanessa Baraitser of the Westminster Magistrates’ Court ruled on Monday that Assange cannot be justly extradited, citing his mental health and the possibility he may attempt suicide.
U.S. authorities are seeking to charge Assange over his role in obtaining and publishing military and diplomatic documents relating to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Assange has been indicted in the U.S. with 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act and conspiring to hack into government computers.
Being found guilty on all 17 charges could land the WikiLeaks founder with a prison sentence up to 175 years.
Assange’s fiancee, Stella Morris, called the ruling a “victory for Julian,” but stressed that their struggles were far from over.
“Let’s not forget: the indictment in the U.S. has not been dropped,” Morris said in a statement following the ruling. “We are extremely concerned that the U.S. government has decided to appeal this decision and continues to want to punish Julian and make him disappear into the deepest darkest hole of the U.S. prison system for the rest of his life.”
VIDEO:
Julian #Assange's fiancee Stella Moris says 'today is a victory for Julian' after a British judge ruled the WikiLeaks founder should not be extradited to the US, but adds she is 'extremely concerned that the US government has decided to appeal this decision' pic.twitter.com/jJ5JMEKE3H
— AFP News Agency (@AFP) January 4, 2021
Human rights groups hailed the ruling as a victory after it was announced, but the justification made by Baraitser was not the rationale they were seeking to have stop Assange’s extradition. Instead, they had hoped the judge would have agreed with their argument that the charges against Assange violated his free press rights and were politically motivated.
Baraitser appeared to reject those arguments, stating that American authorities seeking his extradition had brought the case “in good faith.” She also suggested that free speech rights don’t give “unfettered discretion by Mr. Assange to decide what he’s going to publish.”
Baraitser did rule, however, that “Mr. Assange’s risk of committing suicide, if an extradition order were to be made, [would] be substantial.”
The extradition policy that exists between the U.K. and the U.S. prohibits extradition for a “political offense.” According to Marjorie Cohn, professor emerita at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and the deputy secretary general of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, extraditing Assange to the custody of U.S. officials would be a direct violation of that agreement.
“Assange was indicted for exposing U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. That is a classic political offense,” Cohn said, writing for Truthout in February last year. “Moreover, Assange’s extradition would violate the legal prohibition against sending a person to a country where he is in danger of being tortured.”
Baraitser’s ruling also appeared to include a subtle indictment of the U.S. prison system. The judge wrote that “it would be unjust and oppressive by reason of Mr. Assange’s mental condition” for him to be sent away, citing the “harsh conditions” of where he would most likely be detained in the U.S. as being detrimental to his mental well-being.
Prosecutors representing the U.S. have said they plan to appeal the ruling.
The material for which Assange was indicted, published by WikiLeaks in 2010 and 2011, was supplied by former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, who was sentenced to 35 years in prison for her role in exposing the Army’s criminal actions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Manning later had her sentence commuted to the seven years she had already served by former President Barack Obama.
WikiLeaks published hundreds of thousands of documents related to the wars in those two countries. Among the most notorious of those publications was the 2007 “Collateral Murder” video, showing an Army helicopter and members of the U.S. military targeting and firing upon unarmed citizens in Baghdad, including two Reuters journalists. Eighteen individuals were killed in that incident, and according to Cohn, at least three separate war crimes prohibited by the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Army Field Manual were also visible within the video.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.