During testimony in the United States Senate on Tuesday, Pete Hegseth, former Fox News personality turned president-elect Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Department of Defense, refused to answer a question regarding whether he’d follow an order from Trump to shoot at demonstrators.
Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) cited past assertions from former Defense Secretary Mark Esper, who had served under Trump’s first term in office. In a memoir Esper authored, he recounted how Trump had asked what methods would be acceptable to respond to demonstrators during an uprising outside of the White House in 2020 sparked by the police killing of George Floyd.
Trump had asked Esper if the military could “just shoot [protesters]…in the legs or something.” Esper recounted how he struggled to explain to Trump that that was an amoral and unconscionable option.
“I had to figure out a way to walk Trump back without creating the mess I was trying to avoid,” Esper wrote.
During day one of Hegseth’s nomination hearings, Hirono, referencing Esper’s recollections, framed her question in a way that couldn’t be misinterpreted: “Would you carry out such an order from President Trump?” she asked.
Hegseth refused to answer, instead recounting how he had served in the D.C. National Guard when the uprisings were unfolding. When Hirono interrupted Hegseth to ask him again, he still refused to answer the question directly.
Exasperated with his refusal to respond adequately, Hirono said she would interpret his non-answer as an affirmative to her question.
“You know what? That sounds to me that you will comply with such an order. You will shoot protesters in the leg,” she said.
Hirono’s concerns are based not only on comments from past Trump officials, but on statements made by Trump himself.
During his presidential campaign last year, Trump indicated that he planned to use the military to execute his mass deportation plans and to “enforce” laws in cities like Chicago and New York. He also said that the National Guard should be deployed against left-leaning people, whom he baselessly claimed would disrupt the election, describing such individuals as “the enemy from within.”
In 2023, The Washington Post reported that Trump and his allies, presuming he would win the election, had made plans to deploy the military against demonstrators on his first day back in office. And in 2020, Trump threatened governors of several states with military force during the George Floyd uprisings.
It’s currently unclear whether Hegseth has enough votes from Republicans (who control 53 seats of the Senate) to be confirmed as defense secretary, but past reports have indicated that the nominee — who also faces accusations of physical and sexual abuse against women, and who has made disparaging comments about women and LGBTQ people serving in the military — may well be confirmed, having gained momentum among right-leaning senators over the past month.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.