Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Calls for Single Day of Violence by Police to Cut Down Crime

Throughout his campaign, Trump has repeatedly expressed a desire to become an autocratic leader.

Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at the Bayfront Convention Center on September 29, 2024, in Erie, Pennsylvania.

During a campaign rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, on Sunday, former President Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, suggested that the U.S. should have one day of state-sponsored, police-enacted violence.

Trump claimed that such a day was necessary to address supposedly rising crime rates across the country, despite the fact that violent crime is actually decreasing in the U.S. He attributed the nonexistent rise in crime to undocumented people, spewing racist accusations against immigrants and at one point referring to undocumented people as “animals” — rhetoric that many critics have pointed out is blatantly fascist.

Trump claimed that “one real rough, nasty day” of police violence would somehow stop crimes from taking place across the U.S.

“One rough hour — and I mean real rough — the word will get out and it will end immediately, you know? It will end immediately,” Trump added.

Trump’s remarks come just weeks after he knowingly spread racist lies about Haitian residents of Springfield, Ohio, inciting bomb threats and acts of violent harassment against immigrants in the city. His speech represents just the latest instance in which he has expressed a desire to serve as an autocratic leader. (Trump has previously vowed to act as a dictator on his first day in office, and promised to use the Department of Justice to attack his perceived political enemies.)

A spokesperson for Trump has claimed that his recent comments were “clearly…in jest.” In the past, however, Trump’s staff has similarly characterized his disturbing statements as jokes, only for Trump to clarify that he was serious.

In response to Trump’s remarks, some political observers opined that Trump’s proposal was similar to the plot of the 2013 horror movie “The Purge” and its subsequent spin-offs, which depict a dystopian, totalitarian America where residents are allowed to engage in violence one day a year without legal repercussions.

“The Republican candidate for President has come out in favor of the fucking Purge,” The Nation’s justice correspondent Elie Mystal marveled.

“Did Trump watch the Purge or just independently come up with the same idea?” asked political reporter Paul Blest.

“No big deal, just one of the two candidates for President calling for a ‘really violent day’ of nationwide police brutality. Don’t bother covering this as a major story, anyone,” said former Obama presidential speechwriter Dan Cluchey.

Others pointed out that “The Purge” comparison isn’t entirely accurate — in the movie, every American is incentivized to take part in the violence, whereas Trump’s proposal would apply only to police officers and Border Patrol (with perhaps some leeway given his supporters). A more accurate comparison, they said, was to the real-life example of Kristallnacht, a wave of violent, anti-Jewish pogroms in Germany that Nazi leaders encouraged in November of 1938.

“Trump yesterday called for a new Kristallnacht,” Public Notice journalist Aaron Rupar said, sharing video of Trump’s statement.

“I’ve seen this described as ‘The Purge’ which is wrong. That was a movie where the population was set against itself. This is the description of state-sponsored wide-spread violence. It actually happened,” said Jim Stewartson, co-host of podcast Radicalized, referring to Kristallnacht.

Stewartson also described Trump’s speech as being “one of the most dangerous…of the 21st century,” noting that his scapegoating of marginalized populations echoed Nazi calls for pogroms.

Jennifer Mercieca, a professor and historian of American political rhetoric at Texas A&M, said that Trump’s call for state-sponsored violence should not be taken lightly.

“Just like how dictators don’t typically self-limit their dictatorships to ‘only one day,’ when they start a ‘day of violence’ it lasts a lot longer than a day,” Mercieca said, referencing Trump’s past statement about wanting to be a dictator on his first day back in office. “There’s no such thing as a limited, one-day only violent dictatorship. Don’t be fooled.”

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $150,000 in one-time donations and to add 1,500 new monthly donors.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy