The Department of Justice (DOJ) has reportedly obtained new evidence suggesting that former President Donald Trump sought to obstruct the return of several government documents he had improperly transferred from the White House to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
The new details of Trump’s obstruction efforts were published in a Washington Post report over the weekend, which cited numerous sources with knowledge of the DOJ investigation into Trump, which is being led by special counsel Jack Smith.
In late spring of 2022, Trump was subpoenaed by the DOJ, which had been in talks with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) over how the former president had failed to return government documents he had removed from the White House upon his departure from the presidency, including hundreds of documents marked as classified.
NARA had sought to get the documents back for over a year, as the Presidential Records Act requires all documents handled by any president to be turned over to the agency when their term expires. After Trump eluded those efforts for all of 2021, NARA had threatened to involve Congress in the matter, prompting Trump and his lawyers to agree to return some of the documents in January 2022.
Shortly after, NARA alerted the DOJ that some of the documents that had been retrieved were marked as classified, prompting the agency to issue a subpoena in June for the return of all classified documents that remained at Mar-a-Lago.
Trump did not turn over all classified documents at that time, however, despite his lawyers crafting and signing an affidavit affirming that he had. While it’s been known for months that Trump had ordered people at Mar-a-Lago to move classified material elsewhere on the estate after the DOJ subpoena was executed, new evidence has surfaced suggesting that Trump had personally rifled through the material prior to the subpoena being carried out.
Citing statements from unnamed sources familiar with the investigation’s proceedings, The Washington Post reported that Trump went through those classified documents “apparently out of a desire to keep certain things in his possession.” Investigators’ assumptions on Trump’s motivations are based on witness statements and security camera footage, among other evidence, The Post said.
Obstruction has long been at the heart of the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation, which Smith has overseen since around the time last fall that Trump announced he would be running in the 2024 presidential election. Indeed, the affidavit included in the warrant to search the premises in August included a statement from the FBI saying there was “cause to believe that evidence of obstruction” would be found.
A key element of any obstruction case is to demonstrate intent. The new evidence suggests that Trump indeed sought to deceive DOJ investigators when they subpoenaed him in June, as investigators have also found evidence that Trump sought legal advice on how to keep the documents after being told by his advisers that it would be illegal for him to do so. Text messages and emails provided to the Justice Department by a former aide to Trump also suggest that he told advisers to mislead investigators on what documents were returned to them and what, if any, remained in his possession.
Thousands of government documents have been retrieved from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate since the start of 2022. Of those documents, more than 300 were marked as classified.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.