Skip to content Skip to footer

More Than 300 Classified Docs Have Been Retrieved From Mar-a-Lago — So Far

Both the ongoing inquiry and request for more surveillance footage suggest the DOJ may think more docs are being hidden.

Police outside of Mar-a-Lago in West Palm Beach, Florida, on August 9, 2022, the day after the FBI searched Donald Trump's estate.

The federal government has collected over 300 classified documents since the beginning of the year from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, which the former president improperly removed from the White House upon his departure from office, sources told The New York Times.

The number of retrieved documents has the potential to rise, as the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ongoing investigation suggests that it may be uncertain whether all the documents have yet been collected, or whether Trump has more that have not been turned over yet, The Times reported.

Some of the material that has been retrieved includes documents pertaining to the FBI, the CIA and the National Security Agency (NSA), and deal with matters of national security.

The high volume of classified material suggests that Trump allies were wrong to downplay the significance of the search warrant that was executed earlier this month at Mar-a-Lago by FBI officials. Several Republicans who still align themselves with the former president have made a plethora of defenses for him, including claiming without evidence that the agency planted evidence at Trump’s home during the search, wrongly stating that Trump created a standing order to declassify any documents he took, and that the FBI overstepped its bounds in searching the property, and should have just asked for the documents in a less intrusive manner.

In fact, the evidence and events over the past year suggest that simply asking Trump to return the documents wouldn’t have worked, as federal officials have been trying to get them back for months, and only recently retrieved a larger trove of classified documents, some possibly relating to nuclear weapons.

In January, the National Archives retrieved around 150 classified documents from Mar-a-Lago, amounting to 15 boxes total, and in June, the DOJ issued a subpoena to retrieve another 26 boxes from the property. Within that subpoena, it was ordered that any other additional classified documents Trump had be immediately returned to the federal government.

But after an informer told DOJ that Trump had more documents stashed away, and after reviewing surveillance footage at Mar-a-Lago, the Justice Department filed a request for a search warrant in August, which a magistrate judge in Florida signed off on, citing “reliable evidence” based on probable cause.

After that search warrant was executed, another 20 boxes were removed from Mar-a-Lago, including 11 sets of classified documents.

According to portions of the search warrant that have been made public so far, it appears that the DOJ is looking into possible violations of the Espionage Act — a law used to prosecute individuals who (purposely or by accident) mishandle government information to the detriment of the United States’s national security interests. (The law has also been used to prosecute whistleblowers and antiwar activists.)

The Times also reported that Trump himself was familiar with the material in his possession — putting to rest another excuse by his loyalists that he simply was too rushed during his departure from Washington to examine what he was taking. In late 2021, just prior to the National Archives’s retrieval of documents, Trump personally went through the boxes of classified material he had at Mar-a-Lago, the sources told the newspaper.

“I had a security clearance prior to being in Congress,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-California) said. “And as a Member of Congress, I have a top secret security clearance. Let me be clear: if I went through classified documents and kept 300 of them in my home, I would be arrested immediately and indicted.”

“The quantity of classified material taken — over 300 documents per the NYTimes — should make it clear this was not simply a few trinkets to show off with friends,” chimed in journalist Steven Beschloss. “No matter how many try to say this is no big deal, we’re just at the beginning of learning how deep this crime may go.”

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?