Skip to content Skip to footer

Report: DOJ Prosecutors Say There’s Enough Evidence to Prosecute Trump

Trump could be charged with obstruction, though that wouldn’t be the only charge he’d face, sources say.

Former President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Minden-Tahoe Airport on October 8, 2022, in Minden, Nevada.

A group of prosecutors within the Department of Justice (DOJ) believe there is enough evidence to charge former President Donald Trump with a crime relating to his improper removal of government documents from the White House to his Mar-a-Lago home, following his departure from office.

According to Bloomberg, which cites unnamed sources with knowledge of the matter, DOJ prosecutors believe Trump could be charged, at minimum, with obstruction.

The prosecutors have not yet made any formal recommendation to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has the final say in whether to charge Trump. The sources also told the publication that it’s also unlikely that the former president would be solely charged with obstruction.

The sources also said that charges, if they are to come about, won’t be filed before the midterms, and will likely come after the Christmas holiday.

According to a partially released affidavit from the Mar-a-Lago search warrant, the FBI said that it had “cause to believe that evidence of obstruction would be found at” the former president’s resort. It’s highly likely that that claim is related to a subpoena that was issued to Trump this past spring, where he was ordered to return all classified documents taken from the White House and to affirm, through his legal counsel, that he had none remaining on the premises.

Earlier this month, it was revealed that Trump had ordered someone to move documents — including some marked classified — from a storage locker at Mar-a-Lago to his private residence, both before and after the DOJ came to the property to execute their subpoena order. That action could constitute an act of obstruction, as it demonstrates Trump trying to hide documents and disobey a direct subpoena order telling him to turn over all classified documents.

In addition to obstruction, the affidavit indicated that the DOJ was also looking into the possibility of Espionage Act violations by Trump. That law, though historically used to prosecute government whistleblowers and antiwar activists, is concerned with the handling of government documents in a way, whether purposeful or unintentionally, that harms or could harm national security.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has tried since the beginning of 2021 — when Trump left the presidency — to recover government documents it knew he had been keeping in the residence wing of the White House while he was in office. After nearly a full year of refusing to hand those documents back, the former president finally relented, agreeing to let the agency recover them in January 2022 (but only after they had threatened to involve Congress in the matter).

When NARA found classified materials among the documents, they alerted the DOJ, which led to the spring subpoena order. After evidence surfaced that the former president indeed had more classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, even after he denied it, the FBI searched the estate in August.

More than 11,000 documents have been recovered altogether, including more than 300 documents that had classified markings on them. NARA has stated that it is still missing some material it believes Trump had in his possession at the start of 2021.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.