On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from former President Donald Trump regarding the trove of government documents — some of which were marked as classified — that were retrieved from his Mar-a-Lago estate this summer.
The order means that a special master, tasked with examining thousands of government documents that were removed from Trump’s Palm Beach, Florida, home, will be barred from examining documents that are marked as classified.
The FBI executed a search warrant in early August based on evidence that Trump had classified documents in his possession, following two attempts to retrieve the documents earlier this year. Two weeks after the search warrant was executed on his estate, Trump’s lawyers demanded that a special master review all of the records that were removed, including more than 100 classified documents, in order to determine whether any of Trump’s legal privileges had been violated.
Many legal experts have questioned whether the classified documents could be considered privileged, as they belong to the U.S. government rather than Trump, even if they are presidential records from his time in the White House. Nevertheless, Trump-appointed district court Judge Aileen Cannon agreed to appoint a special master, naming Judge Raymond Dearie to the position.
As part of her order appointing a special master, Cannon stated that the DOJ could not continue examining the documents marked as classified, claiming that the classified markings didn’t necessarily mean that Trump’s executive privilege didn’t apply. The DOJ appealed that rule, and in mid-September, a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with them, placing a stay on Cannon’s order and allowing investigators to examine the classified documents.
“For our part, we cannot discern why [Trump] would have an individual interest in or need for any of the one-hundred documents with classification markings,” the ruling from the 11th Circuit Court panel of judges said.
Trump’s legal team appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court earlier this month, asking that the special master retain the ability to determine whether or not the classified documents were privileged. The Court responded this week by issuing a single-sentence order stating that it would not hear the appeal.
“The application to vacate the stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on September 21, 2022, presented to Justice [Clarence] Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied,” the order said.
None of the justices on the Court explained the reasoning for their decision, and it is unknown how many of them sided with Trump.
The Court’s refusal to entertain Trump’s appeal means that the DOJ can continue to examine the documents marked as classified, and that Dearie will be barred from including them in his examination of the documents.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.