Lawyers for former President Donald Trump have filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, aiming to overturn part of an 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on the scores of classified documents that were retrieved from Mar-a-Lago by the Justice Department earlier this year.
The ruling from a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit found that District Judge Aileen Cannon’s order to have special master Judge Raymond Dearie review the thousands of documents found at the Palm Beach, Florida, estate — including over 100 documents that were marked as classified — was partially improper.
Cannon’s decree had said the Department of Justice (DOJ) could not continue examining the classified documents due to Trump’s claims of executive privilege. But the 11th Circuit Court dismissed Cannon’s rule in its judgment in mid-September, noting that the documents belonged to the government, not Trump — and therefore a department of the federal government should be allowed to examine them.
“For our part, we cannot discern why [Trump] would have an individual interest in or need for any of the one-hundred documents with classification markings,” the panel of judges said in their ruling on September 21.
But Trump’s lawyers sought to have the Supreme Court overturn that ruling on Tuesday, arguing, in part, that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals didn’t have legal standing on the issue.
“The Eleventh Circuit lacked jurisdiction to review, much less stay, an interlocutory order of the District Court providing for the Special Master to review materials seized from President Trump’s home,” the legal brief that Trump’s team filed on Tuesday stated.
That argument is inconsistent with how the appellate system works, some observed.
“If the appeals court didn’t have jurisdiction over a court in its district, then I am confused,” Carol Leonnig, a reporter for The Washington Post, said in an interview with MSNBC.
The appeal also includes the baseless claim that the search of Trump’s home for government documents was wholly political. Trump’s lawyers described the “unprecedented circumstances” as being an “investigation of the Forty-Fifth President of the United States by the administration of his political rival and successor.”
Notably, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) tried for a full year after Trump left the White House to retrieve the records, to no avail. Only after NARA threatened to get Congress involved did Trump relent and allow the agency to retrieve some documents in January. After review of those documents, NARA discovered that some were marked as classified, prompting them to involve the DOJ.
The DOJ then presented Trump with a subpoena and retrieved more records from Mar-a-Lago in June. The department also made Trump’s legal counsel affirm that no more classified documents were being kept at the property, which they did on Trump’s behalf. After evidence surfaced in August showing that documents remained at Mar-a-Lago, however, the FBI executed a search warrant at the estate.
President Joe Biden has said that he didn’t know anything about the search warrant prior to its execution.
Interestingly, the brief from Trump’s legal team does not ask the Supreme Court to halt the DOJ’s examination of classified documents. Rather, it asks that special master Dearie be able to continue examining the documents to determine if Trump’s executive privilege claims are justified.
Some have speculated that Trump is simply trying to get his hands on copies of the classified material.
“Trump wants his own copy of the 103 classified documents, pure and simple,” said legal analyst Lisa Rubin. “And telling the Supreme Court that an appeals court had no jurisdiction to stop Dearie’s review of those records is their vehicle for getting them.”
Many legal experts have noted early signs that members of the High Court don’t view the matter as urgent. Justice Clarence Thomas, who oversees the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, set a deadline of one week for the department to respond to Trump’s legal filing, for example.
“Justice Thomas is giving DOJ a week to respond. That’s another week where [DOJ investigators] can keep working,” noted former federal prosecutor Joyce Alene. “That’s a signal Thomas doesn’t view this as a matter that should be pushed along for a fast decision.”
Trump’s appeal appears destined to fail, said University of Texas at Austin Law School professor Steve Vladeck.
“This is what’s most conspicuously absent from his application: Any argument about how the stay” from the 11th Circuit court, “by itself, is harming Trump in a way that can’t be ameliorated later,” Vladeck tweeted. “Without meeting that criteria, Trump can’t make out the *procedural* case for the relief he’s seeking.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 464 new monthly donors in the next 8 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy