U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who appointed a special master to determine which of the documents that the FBI retrieved from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate last month were privileged — if any — has overruled an order from the special master that sought to clarify Trump’s claims that the classified documents may have been “planted” by the FBI.
Judge Raymond Dearie, who was nominated to be special master by Trump’s legal team and appointed to the position by Cannon earlier this month, had ordered Trump’s lawyers to examine the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) inventory list of documents retrieved from Mar-a-Lago and to indicate if they disagreed with what was included — essentially ordering them to explicitly state whether they agreed with Trump’s unfounded claims that documents had been planted by the FBI during the retrieval process.
Trump’s lawyers objected to the order earlier this week. On Thursday, Cannon ruled in their favor, saying that the requirement was unnecessary. This is the first time since Cannon appointed Dearie that she has rejected one of his orders.
That Cannon overturned a decree from the special master who she herself appointed — and sided with a president who appointed her to the role she currently serves — has raised eyebrows, especially since a number of legal experts have concluded that there was no need for a special master in the first place.
Cannon has also extended the timeframe for Dearie to carry out his work as special master — a move that is being celebrated by Trump’s allies, as his legal team’s strategy thus far seems to be to delay the process as much as possible.
The DOJ has reportedly filed a notice of appeal to Cannon’s order, seeking to keep Dearie’s requirements intact and to shorten the timeframe of his work, requesting that it end in November rather than in mid-December.
It’s not yet clear if Cannon’s rejection of the special master’s order will delay the DOJ’s investigation. The Justice Department will still be able to carry out some of its work, as it appealed to a different aspect of Cannon’s order establishing the special master that required them to stop examining the classified documents they retrieved last month.
The DOJ was successful in that appeal, persuading a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court that her order was unnecessary since the classified documents in question were the property of the U.S. government, not Trump.
“[Trump] does not have a possessory interest in the documents at issue, so he does not suffer a cognizable harm if the United States reviews documents he neither owns nor has a personal interest in,” the 11th Circuit Court ruled.
Several legal experts and political observers have denounced Cannon’s latest action on social media.
“Judge Cannon comes to Trump’s rescue, saving him from the Special Master she appointed at his request. She’s basically one of Trump’s lawyers at this point,” political analyst Arieh Kovler said on Twitter.
“Judge Cannon tinkers badly with (and with typos) Judge Dearie’s scheduling order, relieving Trump of obligation to say whether docs were planted, even though she had wanted a clear inventory of what was found,” noted Andrew Weissmann, a former Assistant United States Attorney. “She is such a disgrace.”
“OUTRAGEOUS. Yes, I know I’m shouting,” wrote former Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks. “I don’t do it often, but [the order from] Judge Cannon is shocking.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.