In the final weeks of his tenure, former President Donald Trump asked several of his advisers about pardoning individuals who were involved in the January 6 Capitol attack.
In an article that was published on Wednesday, former advisers to the ex-president spoke to Politico about Trump’s mindset during his final days in office. The advisers were granted anonymity in the article.
One adviser said that Trump asked a variety of questions on issuing a blanket pardon to his loyalists who breached the U.S. Capitol building shortly after the attack.
“Do you think I should pardon them? Do you think it’s a good idea? Do you think I have the power to do it?” Trump asked the advisor.
Another adviser told Politico that Trump asked questions about how individuals who were involved in the Capitol breach might be prosecuted. He also wanted to know if pardoning hundreds of his loyalists could potentially work to his advantage.
“He thought if he could do it, these people would never have to testify or be deposed,” that adviser said.
Other White House advisers pointed out that a blanket pardon might not be appropriate, given that no one had been formally charged for their involvement in the attack at the time. Some, including White House counsel Pat Cipollone, allegedly threatened to leave the administration out of protest if Trump issued the pardons.
The revelation that Trump was thinking about handing out pardons to hundreds of his loyalists after they attacked the Capitol comes days after the former president said he might pardon the Capitol attackers if he is elected president in 2024.
Although he hasn’t yet made a formal campaign announcement, Trump said last Saturday at a rally in Conroe, Texas, that he might pardon his loyalists if he ever reenters the White House as commander in chief.
“So many people have been asking me about it,” Trump said at the rally. “If I run and if I win, we will treat those people from January 6 fairly.”
If that “requires pardons, we will give them pardons,” Trump added.
Members of the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack have suggested that Trump’s comments may have violated the law. Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-California), for example, said that Trump is “absolutely” engaging in witness tampering by encouraging his supporters who are facing charges not to cooperate with the inquiry, and by suggesting that they will be pardoned if he is elected for a second time.
The U.S. Constitution contains very few guidelines, if any, on issuing a presidential pardon, and there isn’t any congressional or judicial oversight on the matter.
Within the first two years of Trump’s presidency, the former president issued 11 pardons and commutations. Meanwhile, current President Joe Biden hasn’t issued a single pardon or commutation since becoming president — and there hasn’t been any indication that he plans to pardon anyone by the end of this year, despite the fact that his administration said that it was evaluating clemency requests last August.
Last fall, the White House vowed to create an equitable pardoning process in the future. But it’s taking too long, says Nkechi Taifa, head of Justice Roundtable, a coalition of more than 100 organizations seeking to reform the federal criminal legal system.
“Their rhetoric says that they understand what we’re saying, and that they’re working on it…If it’s going to take this long for a first step, how long is it going to take for the rest?” Taifa said in December.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.