Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Demands Changes for Debate, Prompting Claims He’s Afraid to Debate Harris

Trump also suggested that the Republican Party should be “reimbursed” due to Biden dropping out.

Former President Donald Trump speaks after officially accepting the Republican presidential nomination on stage on the fourth day of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum on July 18, 2024, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Following President Joe Biden’s historic announcement over the weekend that he is dropping out of the 2024 presidential race (and endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris to take his place), former president and Republican nominee Donald Trump is demanding changes to the next scheduled debate.

Political pundits believe Trump wants changes to the debate because he is threatened by the prospect of facing a younger, more capable candidate.

“Now that Joe has, not surprisingly, has quit the race, I think the Debate, with whomever the Radical Left Democrats choose, should be held on Fox News, rather than very biased ABC,” Trump said in a Truth Social post on Sunday.

There isn’t any legitimate reason to change the debate venue based on recent events. Up until Biden’s departure from the race, Trump was content with holding the debate on a network television station — but now that Harris will likely be his opponent, Trump suddenly wants the debate to air on a less-viewed cable network.

Trump also expressed anger on social media over having to “spend time and money” on campaigning against Biden and having to “start all over again” now that the president isn’t running. He then bizarrely suggested that the Republican Party should be “reimbursed” due to Biden dropping out, and claimed that Biden and Harris were a “threat to democracy” because Biden exiting the race supposedly ignores the will of Democratic voters in the primaries.

Trump’s own undemocratic actions, meanwhile, include instigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, attempting to usurp the Electoral College using a scheme involving fake electors to disrupt the official count, and stating that he wants to become a dictator on his first day of office should he win the presidential election this year.

Although Trump told CNN following Biden’s decision to drop out that “Harris will be easier to beat than Joe Biden would have been,” polling shows that this isn’t true.

As of Monday morning, the aggregate of polling data on RealClearPolling.com showed that Trump was ahead of Biden, on average, by 3.0 points. Trump is also ahead of Harris, but only by 1.7 points, well within the margin of error for most polls that are conducted nationally.

Critics seized on Trump’s demands that the terms of the debate be changed, saying he was not up to the challenge of debating Harris.

“Anyone who thinks Trump isn’t running scared of Harris should check out his last few Truth Social posts,” said Zeteo’s editor-in-chief Mehdi Hasan.

“Donald Trump is afraid to debate Kamala Harris,” wrote Jason Easley, managing editor at PoliticusUSA. “Donald Trump was also afraid to debate Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis [during the GOP primaries].”

“I don’t think he wants to debate Kamala Harris…he’s a political coward, there’s no doubt about it,” Al Sharpton said on MSNBC Monday morning.

“Trump backs out of scheduled debate. Afraid to face Kamala one on one,” Talking Points Memo founder Josh Marshall said.

“Donald Trump is too cowardly to debate Kamala Harris,” former Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.