A group of transgender youth, their parents and a licensed pediatric physician from Tennessee have filed a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to appeal an appellate court’s decision that kept the state’s ban on gender-affirming care in place.
The law bars doctors from providing common therapies to transgender youth in the state, including puberty blockers, hormonal disorder treatment, and more. Medical experts and multiple medical associations have repeatedly said that gender-affirming care can be life-saving.
A group of litigants successfully sued the state of Tennessee in a federal district court, which found that the law violated the fundamental rights of parents and their children to seek treatment for gender dysphoria. But a panel of judges on the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled that decision in favor of the state’s ban in a split 2-1 finding that was issued in late September.
The writ of certiorari filed to the Supreme Court on Wednesday was made by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a pediatric physician, all of whom live in Tennessee and have been affected by the law. Some of the petitioners have stated that the law has affected them financially as well as emotionally and physically, as they have continued to seek care outside of the state at their own personal expense.
The brief notes that gender-affirming care “is not new,” and is “provided in accordance with evidence-based clinical guidelines that, like all clinical guidelines, are reviewed and updated as science and medicine evolve.”
“Every major medical organization in the United States agrees that gender-affirming treatments — which, for adolescents, include puberty delaying medication and hormone treatment — are safe, effective, and can be medically necessary,” the brief states, adding:
A substantial body of evidence, including cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, as well as decades of clinical experience, has shown that these medical interventions greatly improve the mental health of adolescents with gender dysphoria.
Within the petition, the petitioners argue that the ban places higher scrutiny on trans kids to receive health care than it does for cisgender youth in the state, thus violating the 14th Amendment. They also allege that the ban violates parents’ fundamental right to make medical decisions for their own children.
A ruling from the Supreme Court would affect the 20-plus states that have passed similar bans within their jurisdictions over the past few years. If the Court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, those laws would become null, allowing transgender kids across the U.S. to access the medical care they require. However, if the Court rules in favor of the states, thousands of trans youth would be detrimentally affected, unable to attain treatment that is not only safe but also life-saving.
It’s also possible that the Court will decide not to hear the case at all, allowing the ban in Tennessee to remain until justices decide to hear a similar petition in the future. Four Supreme Court justices must agree to hear the writ of certiorari before it can be heard by the full bench.
One of the petitioners in the case, a 15-year-old trans teenager who is only identified as L.W., said that they are part of the appeal because they know “how important this care is for tens of thousands of transgender youth” like them.
“It scares me to think about losing the medication that I need,” L.W. said, “and if this law continues, my family may have to leave Tennessee ― the place I have lived and loved my entire life.”
“I want the Justices to know transgender people are not going away and that we deserve the same rights as everyone else,” L.W. added.
Chase Strangio, deputy director for Transgender Justice at the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project, also commented on the importance of a positive outcome from the Supreme Court.
“These laws not only destabilize the lives of transgender youth but also disrupt their families and communities, and threaten established legal protections with far-reaching implications,” Strangio said. “The justices have an opportunity to follow long-standing precedent and block Tennessee’s dangerous law.”
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $81,000 in one-time donations and to add 1250 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy