Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is being urged to recuse himself from a key case after new reporting has revealed deep ties between the justice and corporate plaintiffs seeking to destroy a crucial consumer protection agency.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments in a case brought by payday lenders who are challenging the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The case could result in the death of the agency, which was created after the Great Recession to protect consumers from fraud and predatory practices, and also threatens to disrupt the funding mechanism for a wide range of other government programs that are crucial to the financial health of the U.S.
According to new research by the Revolving Door Project, Thomas has a number of deep connections with groups who have been trying to kill the agency since before it was even established.
Former Donald Trump lawyer John Eastman, for instance, has filed an amicus brief supporting the payday lender plaintiffs in the case. Eastman is a former law clerk for Thomas who recently signed onto a letter defending the justice’s ethics in the wake of revelations of his extensive corruption, and who once texted Thomas’s wife, Ginni Thomas, to organize the January 6, 2021, attempted coup.
Another supporter of the case to kill the agency is the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, an advocacy group run by the Koch network, which dubiously called the CFPB a “mockery of the separation of powers.” Thomas is reportedly cozy with the Koch family, with ProPublica reporting that the justice has attended at least two Koch family fundraisers, arriving at least once by private jet and serving as a strong fundraising draw.
Through his membership in the Horatio Alger Association, an exclusive group comprised of the U.S. elite, Thomas has numerous other potential conflicts of interest that could affect his ability to impartially rule on the case, Revolving Door writes in The American Prospect. Horatio Alger is packed with financial industry leaders who have a vested interest in seeing the CFPB gutted.
Horatio Alger Association President Gregory Abel, for instance, has been named the eventual successor to Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett and is a top executive for the powerful hedge fund. Berkshire Hathaway has been scrutinized numerous times for violating consumer protection laws — once resulting in a 2022 settlement from the company for $22 million for illegal redlining in a case led by the Department of Justice and the CFPB.
Other Alger members are leaders at companies like JPMorgan Chase, TD Bank and USAA, which have previously been fined by the CFPB. One Alger member, Tom Donohue, is the former CEO and a current board member of the ultra-conservative lobbying group the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which formerly lobbied against the creation of the agency under Donohue’s leadership.
Thomas has shown himself willing to take great lengths to benefit Horatio Alger and its members. As a member for over three decades, Thomas has been invited to attend lavish events across the world. In return, Thomas provides, quite literally, unfettered access to the Supreme Court — each year, he invites Alger into the chambers of the Court to induct its new members, despite the Supreme Court chambers normally being kept sealed tightly.
Justice Samuel Alito also has ties to people who would benefit from the death of the CFPB, most notably his billionaire benefactor Paul Singer, who holds at least $90 million in financial companies overseen by the CFPB. Alito has already previously ruled in favor of Singer’s hedge fund — after Singer took Alito on a luxury fishing trip in his private jet.
“Though we at the Revolving Door Project called for Thomas’s and Alito’s recusal from this case in light of these ethics scandals, the Court’s well-established contempt for accountability and integrity offers little hope they will heed our advice,” wrote Revolving Door Project senior researcher Vishal Shankar. “Should both of them persist in hearing CFPB v. CFSA on Tuesday despite their glaring conflicts of interest, the case for their impeachment and for rebalancing the Court to create an ethical majority will become even stronger.”
Both justices have also personally benefited from Leonard Leo, the conservative dark money puppetmaster behind the nomination of every sitting conservative member of the Supreme Court. A report by Accountable.US this week found that Leo-backed groups have funneled over $9 million to groups that have filed amicus briefs in favor of the plaintiffs in the case.
“Leonard Leo spent years stacking the court with ideological kindred spirits. Now he’s funding a dark web of special interest groups to push an extreme agenda,” Accountable.US president Caroline Ciccone said in a statement. “If Leo has his way, the Supreme Court will toss American consumers overboard to loan sharks and predatory lenders hungry to line their pockets by any means necessary.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.