A new report from Politico has sparked renewed scrutiny of how Ginni Thomas and other conservative activists co-founded a nonprofit right-wing advocacy group — which was funded, in part, by billionaire Harlan Crow — in anticipation of the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision.
The report also examines the actions of Thomas and other notable conservatives after she dismantled the group, prompting some to question whether illegal financial activities took place.
The organization, Liberty Central, was founded in late 2009 with the primary goal of blocking key initiatives of the Obama administration. The organization described itself as a “billion-dollar force” that would push for certain cases to be heard by the Supreme Court, with hopes of overturning established precedents on abortion, affirmative action, and other issues.
The organization was co-founded by Leonard Leo, a right-wing power broker and a master of post-Citizens United dark money spending who is currently under federal investigation.
Liberty Central was founded three months after final arguments in the Citizens United case were made before the Court, when it appeared as though conservative bloc members of the Court seemed open to upending regulations on campaign finance laws.
After the group was formed — and after the Court did in fact upend those laws, making it more difficult to track money in U.S. politics — Ginni Thomas was criticized for spearheading an organization whose stated goals were intrinsically linked to influencing the Supreme Court’s work (including the work of Justice Clarence Thomas, who was then and still is married to Ginni Thomas). In response, Thomas left the organization and created a consulting firm, which provided advice to other right-wing organizations on submitting amicus briefs to the High Court.
Leo continued to help Thomas financially, restarting a charity group called the Judicial Education Project, which provided funding to Thomas’s firm. Politico reported that there are significant discrepancies in IRS filings from that organization to Thomas’s company, leading some to question whether the money given to the firm was improper or even illegal.
Per tax laws, the firm could only receive funds from organizations like Leo’s if Thomas in turn provided a service to them.
“This stinks to high heaven,” Norman Ornstein, emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote on X in response to the Politico article. “We need the Internal Revenue Service and the justice department to investigate. It looks like tax offenses, criminal ones, not to mention the sheer corruption. Leonard Leo and Ginni Thomas are despicable.”
The report also links Crow to the couple, detailing how he provided around $500,000 to help launch Liberty Central.
Crow and the Thomases have been the subject of several ProPublica investigations in recent months that have showcased how the billionaire has financed various aspects of the couple’s lives — including exorbitant trips, real estate deals, tuition payments for a relative the Thomases had been the guardian of, and other big spending items.
Thomas, who admitted in his latest financial disclosure that Crow had financed many of his luxurious travels, said that he was advised that actions by the Court didn’t have to be made public, alleging that the billionaire “did not have business before the Court.” That assertion is untrue, as several Supreme Court cases in the years that Crow has funded portions of the Thomases’ lives would impact Crow’s real estate, commercial, industrial and other business interests.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 4 days to add 310 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.