During a training session with teachers last week, a Texas school district administrator instructed teachers to present “opposing” perspectives about the Holocaust in their classrooms.
Gina Peddy, the Carroll Independent School District’s executive director of curriculum and instruction in Southlake, Texas, was secretly recorded during the October 8 staff meeting. The audio of the exchange between Peddy and teachers attending the meeting was shared with NBC News.
The training session happened four days after a fourth-grade teacher in the district was reprimanded by the school board for having a book entitled “This Book Is Anti-Racist” in their classroom. Parents of a child in the class had complained to the district that the book went against their “morals and faith.”
During the meeting, Peddy emphasized that teachers in the district should abide by newly-passed state statutes. “Try to remember the concepts of [Texas House Bill] 3979,” she said, referring to a Texas law passed earlier this year requiring teachers to present multiple perspectives on topics that are “widely debated and currently controversial.”
“Make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives,” Peddy continued.
When teachers asked how there could be opposing viewpoints on the Holocaust, Peddy responded, “Believe me, that’s come up.”
Clay Robison, a spokesperson for Texas State Teachers Association, condemned Peddy’s interpretation of the statute.
“We find it reprehensible for an educator to require a Holocaust denier to get equal treatment with the facts of history,” Robison said. “That’s absurd. It’s worse than absurd. And this law does not require it.”
Upon release of the audio, a spokesperson for the district said in a statement:
Our district recognizes that all Texas teachers are in a precarious position with the latest legal requirements… Our purpose is to support our teachers in ensuring they have all of the professional development, resources and materials needed. Our district has not and will not mandate books be removed nor will we mandate that classroom libraries be unavailable.
In light of Peddy’s remarks, some Republicans tried to defend the statue, with one claiming that Carroll Independent Schools “just got it wrong.”
“School administrators should know the difference between factual historical events and fiction,” Texas Sen. Kelly Hancock (R) said. “No legislation is suggesting the action this administrator is promoting.”
However, many educators have opposed the Texas law since its first introduction in the state legislature, noting that it was too vague and that it would make it difficult for teachers to have conversations on important topics in classrooms.
The law also bans the teaching of critical race theory in K-12 schools. Critical race theory is most commonly taught at university level, and isn’t being taught in K-12 schools anywhere in the state — but conservatives have deliberately turned it into a new boogeyman for parents across the U.S. to unduly fear.
Beyond that, the law requires teachers to “give deference to both sides” on historical topics — a mandate that many say legitimizes false historical narratives, and limits critical discussion about topics like racism and white supremacy in schools.
“If we’re not allowing teachers the opportunity to have these honest and intellectually appropriate conversations with their feelings about the past, then we’re basically silencing those communities,” third-grade teacher Lakeisha Patterson said in the run-up to the law’s passage, adding that the bill would effectively be “whitewashing history.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.