A new poll shows that the United States Supreme Court has received its lowest approval rating ever — just two weeks after the Court refused to hear arguments seeking to invalidate a Texas law restricting abortion access after six weeks of pregnancy.
The Texas statute, which began being enforced on September 1, places responsibility of enforcement on individuals rather than the state itself. Individuals are granted the ability to sue anyone they say helped a person procure abortion services, including providers, for sums of up to $10,000.
The Court’s conservative majority issued an order earlier this month saying they would not hear arguments on the case, stating that because the onus is on an individual to enforce the law — rather than the state of Texas — it cannot rule on the statute until an aggrieved party sues. The liberal bloc of justices, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, dissented with that viewpoint, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor calling the Court’s refusal to intervene “stunning.”
“Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of Justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand,” Sotomayor wrote.
Two weeks after that decision by the Court, polling from Quinnipiac University shows that the institution’s public approval has dropped.
According to the poll, which was conducted from September 10-13, just 37 percent of Americans approve of how the Supreme Court is conducting itself. Nearly half (49 percent) of respondents said they have a disapproving view of the High Court.
As Quinnipiac University has pointed out, that approval rating is the lowest the Court has ever received since the poll began asking the question in 2004.
Respondents were also more apt to believe the Court has a conservative bias than a liberal one. When asked if the Court’s ideology was too far to the left, only 19 percent said so. Asked if it was too conservative, however, 34 percent of respondents said that it was.
And although a person’s right to a medical procedure that can significantly affect their health and well-being shouldn’t be up for debate, the poll also found that most Americans want laws like the Texas law banning abortion to be thrown out. Sixty-two percent of those taking part in the poll said that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, compared to just 32 percent who disagreed. Sixty-seven percent said that they agreed with the decision in Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that acknowledged the right to access abortion throughout the U.S.
Even when presented with an incredibly charged question on fetal heartbeat, a majority of Americans still supported a person’s right to have an abortion, the poll found.
When asked if abortion access should be easier or more difficult, a plurality responded in favor of the former. According to the poll, 48 percent of Americans say it should be easier for a person in the U.S. to get an abortion, with just 35 percent holding the opposing view.
Although the Supreme Court avoided the question earlier this year, they may have to address whether Texas’s law can continue to be enforced in the near future. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit this month seeking to invalidate the law, and requested that a federal judge place an injunction on its enforcement earlier this week.
“This attempt to shield a plainly unconstitutional law from review cannot stand,” the DOJ wrote in its request.
The Court is also slated to hear a separate case from Mississippi later this year, in which thestate’s attorney general is attempting to undo the abortion rights guaranteed in Roe v. Wade.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.