A partisan and legal clash is brewing over access to abortion counseling and, in extremely limited circumstances, abortions at federal Veterans Affairs hospitals located in states with new abortion bans. Republican attorneys general across the country are threatening legal action over strictly limited new rules issued by the Biden administration to protect pregnant veterans who are facing tragic circumstances. GOP members of Congress, many of them men, are also lining up against abortion rights for veterans.
In September, the Biden administration announced that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs would offer abortion counseling and referrals, as well as abortions when a patient’s life is in danger, or when a pregnancy results from rape or incest. Fifteen Republican attorneys general from Texas, Mississippi, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and other states said they put the administration “on notice” this week. In a letter, they threatened legal action if Veterans Affairs hospitals run afoul of extremely harmful new abortion and reproductive health restrictions passed in their states after the Supreme Court’s far right majority overturned Roe v. Wade.
The fight could get ugly, both in the courtroom and at the doctor’s office. For example, in Alabama, abortion is now banned except in cases where a patient’s life is in danger, and even then, the procedure is heavily restricted. Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall recently suggested he would prosecute doctors who perform abortions for veterans who are victims of rape or incest, which is allowed under the Biden administration’s new federal rules for Veterans Affairs. Under Alabama’s new abortion law, there is no exception for rape or incest, and abortion providers can face up to 99 years in prison.
Veterans Affairs hospitals, which serve U.S. military veterans and their beneficiaries, do not traditionally offer abortions. Veterans Affairs primarily serves veterans, not active-duty personnel. Gynecology, pregnancy and delivery services are limited or nonexistent in some veterans’ clinics, according to reports. However, Democrats have argued that Veterans Affairs hospitals are typically linked to teaching hospitals, and health care providers qualified to provide abortion counseling should be locally available. Additionally, many Veterans Affairs doctors do not work under state licenses that could be compromised or revoked if they consult a patient about abortion.
Veterans and Democrats cheered when the Biden administration released the new rules expanding abortion services at Veterans Affairs hospitals, one of several executive moves made by the White House after the fall or Roe. However, Republicans see a federal intrusion on the supposed power of state legislatures to target doctors and force patients to give birth as they prepare to challenge President Joe Biden’s executive authority.
Attorney General Lynn Fitch, a staunch defender of the Mississippi abortion ban that brought down Roe at the Supreme Court, said in a statement this week that the Veterans Affairs rule for abortion access is either a “cynical attempt to appease” Biden’s “political base,” or a “lawless attempt” to “institute a national regime” of legal abortion, a likely nod to the fear among anti-abortion zealots that federal lands and property could become safe havens for patients. Mississippi consistently suffers from the highest rates of infant mortality, teen pregnancy and poverty among women and children in the nation.
VoteVets, a national organization for progressive veterans, argues the Biden administration did not go far enough in protecting abortion rights for veterans. In extensive comments filed on October 10, the group said they support the new interim rule meant to protect Veterans Affairs doctors who provide abortion counseling and referrals, or an abortion in cases of rape, incest and life-threatening complications. However, VoteVets argues the administration has the legal authority to authorize abortions in all cases within Veterans Affairs, in any state of the country.
The debate is likely to end up in court, perhaps trapping a pregnant veteran in an extensive legal battle over her bodily autonomy and right to receive health care from the country she served. The question for judges will likely hinge on whether abortion is a “needed” medical treatment, which Veterans Affairs is legally obligated to provide. As VoteVets points out, there is a medical consensus that abortion is an essential component of health care for women and anyone who can become pregnant. Beyond that, access to abortion counseling and services is a basic human right, whether a patient served in the military or not.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $81,000 in one-time donations and to add 1250 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy