Israel’s most influential U.S. lobbying group is the largest single source for cash infusions from Republican donors in this election’s Democratic primaries, reveals a new report shining a light on the conservative influence that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s (AIPAC) has on federal politics.
A Politico analysis released on Sunday finds that nearly half — 46 percent — of AIPAC donations to Democratic candidates this year have come from donors who have given to Republican causes or candidates since 2020. This is staggeringly high compared to 2 percent of donations to Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue coming from those who have recently given to Republicans, the analysis found.
AIPAC’s primary goal for this election, and seemingly in previous cycles, has been to push out progressive and Democratic critics of Israel from primaries. The lobbying group and its offshoots are expected to spend $100 million on defeating progressives in this election cycle alone, and has already launched fierce campaigns to unseat people like Representatives Jamaal Bowman (D-New York) and Cori Bush (D-Missouri), who have spoken out against Israel’s genocide in Gaza and apartheid in the West Bank.
The group has focused heavily on Bowman (who is facing an AIPAC-backed challenge from businessman George Latimer), spending half a million dollars every day on the campaign to unseat him on average, according to the New York Working Families Party. Between May and June, AIPAC spent over $13 million on unseating Bowman alone.
The report shows the vast influence that Democratic leaders are allowing Republican-aligned donors to have over Democratic elections in their embrace of AIPAC — and, thus, on the direction of the party itself.
Republican donors to AIPAC are quick to admit their goals of pushing the Democratic party further right.
“Under the William F. Buckley rule of politics, I want to support the most conservative person who can win,” Eric Levine, Republican Jewish Coalition board member, told Politico. Levine has donated to Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-New York), Democrats’ most outspoken supporter of Israel in the House. “And Ritchie Torres is the most conservative person who can win in the Bronx, and he is right on the issue of Israel and antisemitism in the United States.”
If AIPAC is successful in efforts to subjugate candidates who support Palestinian rights — as the group has been before — it would have rippling effects. Congress as a whole would be even more uncritically supportive of Israel than it already is, and it would lose crucial figures who support policy initiatives like universal health care, affordable housing or closing the growing wealth gap.
“AIPAC is using this issue as a way to attract Republican dollars, to then try to oust to a broader progressive agenda as well,” Beth Miller, Jewish Voice for Peace Action political director, told Politico. “The strongest voices for Palestinian rights in Congress right now are aligned with a broad range of progressive issues.”
“Hmm it’s almost like AIPAC functions as a political slush fund for Republican billionaires and should not have influence in the Democratic Party, let alone our primaries,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York), in response to the report.
Indeed, one Republican donor said that supporting pro-Israel candidates is especially important in deep blue regions — the areas that would be more likely to elect progressive candidates who back left-wing proposals.
“It’s important for all American Jews to support them especially if they’re in Democratic stronghold seats to make sure that those seats won’t be occupied by radical far-left Democrats,” said another Republican Jewish Coalition board member, Gabriel Groisman, per the report. Groisman has given to outspoken Zionist Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Florida) and also singles out Torres and Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-New Jersey) as candidates to support.
The Politico report is the latest showing that AIPAC has become a vehicle for conservatives and the wealthy to exercise their influence in Democratic elections. In These Times found in a recent investigation that nearly 60 percent of donors to AIPAC SuperPAC United Democracy Project between January 2023 and February 2024 were top-level executives, including billionaires.
Meanwhile, Truthout found in an investigation published last week that billionaires who have given to United Democracy Project have also given millions of dollars to groups that oppose the labor movement — a movement key to the left.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.