On Tuesday, President Donald Trump told reporters that he was open to the idea of sending incarcerated people — including U.S. citizens — to a “megaprison” in El Salvador, following a deal brokered between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and El Salvador President Nayib Bukele earlier this week.
The prison in question (and the prison system in El Salvador more generally) has been widely criticized for overcrowding and allegations that prison guards are torturing those inside. Human rights groups have noted that hundreds of people have died in El Salvadoran prisons since Bukele began his crackdown on gangs in 2022, with incarcerated people facing torture and abuse and being deprived of medical attention. Civil rights within the country have rapidly diminished under Bukele’s tenure.
“If we had the legal right to do it, I would do it in a heartbeat,” Trump told reporters in the White House.
The president’s choice of words appeared to be an admission that the deal wouldn’t be legal. Rubio also expressed concerns about the deal’s legality after announcing it, but said the administration would “study” the issue further.
“There’s obviously legalities involved,” Rubio said on Monday. “We have a Constitution. But it’s a very generous offer.”
Transporting incarcerated individuals, particularly U.S. citizens, to another country’s prison system would likely run afoul of several constitutional provisions. For starters, there is no Article II provision that empowers the president to direct where incarcerated people can go, much less whether they can be sent to other countries, and the 10th Amendment limits presidents from asserting powers not granted to them — meaning Trump would be on shaky legal ground by asserting that he has the ability to make such decisions. Legal experts have also noted that the action would be a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments.
“This is so incredibly illegal that there’s not even a hint of possible way to do it under any circumstances whatsoever,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council. “It violates international law and the U.S. constitution. Period. End of story.”
But Michael Shifter, senior fellow at the Inter-American Dialogue research institute, told The New York Times that Trump and his cabinet may not concern themselves over the legality of the deal.
“It’s quite extraordinary and unprecedented and alarming in many ways,” Shifter said. “I know a lot of experts have raised questions about the constitutionality and legality of this deal, but Bukele is a leader who has absolute power in El Salvador and it seems Trump seems to be moving in a similar direction in trying to reduce or eliminate any checks on his power.”
As far as what Bukele gets out of such a deal, Rolling Stone reporter Nikki McCann Ramirez noted that, like the United States prison system, El Salvador is exploiting prison labor to help pay the costs of its own penal system, which is rapidly expanding.
“It’s unclear if Bukele would use American prisoners for labor in El Salvador, but he may very well want to lease out a portion of the world’s largest incarcerated population in order to bolster his own nation’s penal workforce,” Ramirez wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have until midnight tonight to add 132 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.