The Heritage Foundation, the far right Washington D.C.-based think tank behind Project 2025’s set of ultra-conservative policy proposals, is one of the main sponsors of the Republican National Convention — placing more doubt into GOP nominee former President Donald Trump’s claim that he has no connection to the group.
As the proposals in Project 2025 increasingly make headlines, Trump has attempted to suggest that he is unaffiliated with the nearly 900-page-long document, which serves as an extreme right “wish list” for how the next presidential administration should run, presuming Trump wins the election.
Among other items, the set of policies within the document range from pushing an anti-abortion agenda within the Department of Health and Human Services, advancing inhumane immigration policies, opposing LGBTQ rights (particularly for transgender people), and a drastic reimagining of the federal government, including shifting how the civil service system works and allowing future presidents to hire and fire workers based on their loyalty to them.
That latter policy plan matches almost exactly Trump’s own calls to get rid of the supposed “deep state,” a conspiracy theory pushed by Trump and his allies purporting that a secret cabal of government employees were working against him while he was president to help Democrats.
Despite the similarities between Trump’s views and the proposals within Project 2025, the GOP candidate denies having any connection to it.
“I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it,” Trump said in a recent Truth Social post. “I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”
Notably, Trump’s statement is contradictory — while he claims to have “no idea” about the project, he also states he has an opinion on it; while he claims it is “ridiculous,” he also wishes those behind the policy packet good luck.
Heritage has also said it is not connected to Trump in any way, with a spokesperson saying on X that, “Project 2025 does not speak for any candidate or campaign.”
Despite Trump and the foundation arguing that they have nothing to do with one another, Heritage is spending a great deal of money to be a part of the convention, which is set to formally nominate Trump as the presidential candidate for the Republican Party next week.
As one of the main sponsors of the Republican National Convention, Heritage’s name will be plastered everywhere at the event, including in places around the city where the convention isn’t taking place. Images taken at Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport, for example, already demonstrate this, welcoming travelers to the convention with signage prominently displaying Heritage’s name as people exit their terminals.
Heritage is also set to host a “policy fest” in downtown Milwaukee on Monday — the first day of the Republican National Convention.
Heritage’s connection to Trump goes beyond their sponsorship of the convention. Indeed, 31 people who contributed to the creation of Project 2025 worked in the Trump administration, demonstrating a deeper link than both Trump and Heritage have admitted to. Russell Vought, for example, a former employee of the Trump White House, wrote a chapter on reforms to the office of the presidency.
Vought is another bridge between Heritage, Trump and the Republican National Committee — he was also the policy director of the committee’s platform writing committee, which this year was revamped to be more reflective of the party’s loyalty to the former president.
While Project 2025 has flown somewhat under the radar in news media, a new poll demonstrates that, the more American voters hear about its proposals, the more negatively they feel about the document overall.
According to a Navigator Research poll that was conducted in June, 7 in 10 respondents said they hadn’t heard enough about Project 2025 to have an opinion on it — around 4 in 5 said they had never even heard of it. But when told that the project “is an extreme Republican plan that will give the president new and unchecked powers over federal agencies, eliminate abortion access, and roll back action on climate change, LGBTQ+ rights, and other areas,” a plurality of respondents, 49 percent, said they opposed it, while 31 percent supported the plan.
Given more specifics about the proposal, including details on 19 of the project’s policies, opposition to Project 2025 increased to 63 percent among respondents in the poll, with only 24 percent approving.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.