The conviction last week of hedge fund billionaire, Raj Rajaratnam, hasn't kept the stench of corruption on Wall Street from wafting all the way down to Washington.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) officials told a Congressional oversight committee on Friday that the FBI is investigating one of their own, a former SEC enforcer named Spencer Barasch. Barasch blocked investigation of a $7 billion Ponzi scheme for years and then went to work for R. Allen Stanford, an alleged Texas swindler, who is facing federal fraud charges.
This is a little like the corrupt police chief in Casablanca, played by Claude Rains, who raids Rick's casino and says, “I'm shocked, shocked to find gambling is going on in here!” and then quickly pockets his winnings. (Barasch still works for the law firm Stanford hired to hide the true nature of his business.)
“The Congressional hearing once again brought to light problems the SEC, like many government agencies, faces with the 'revolving door' of people who go back and forth between government and the private sector,” wrote New York Times reporter Edward Wyatt.
One such agency is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which stunk up Washington, following a surprise announcement by one of its five commissioners last week that she is leaving government service to become NBC's chief lobbyist in Washington. Meredith Baker is jumping ship just four months after she voted for a merger of NBC and Comcast, against the advice of public interest advocates and other media companies, who fear the combined company will monopolize the entertainment, cable TV and Internet industries.
“I have not participated or voted any item, not just those related to Comcast or NBC Universal, since entering discussions about an offer of employment,” Baker said in her defense.
Baker hasn't done anything illegal. She follows former FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, who left the FCC for K Street in 2009. There are rules to keep Baker on the straight and narrow once she makes the move from government regulator to industry lobbyist. She can never lobby anyone in the executive branch regarding the $30 billion Comcast/NBC merger deal. She cannot lobby any FCC commissioner for two years on any other matter either, and if Obama wins another term, she cannot lobby the FCC until 2016. With her new job so proscribed, one wonders why NBC hired her. Well, those restrictions don't mean much. She can lobby Congress right away and have legislators haul NBC's coal to Newcastle. And you can bet she will.
Baker is one of many who leave government for the industry they once regulated. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, more than 40 of the 120 Congressmen who left office in 2010 did not leave Washington. They became lobbyists. And that's the problem.
Baker and Barasch both went to bed with the industry they were supposed to be regulating. The only difference between the two is how and when they got paid. Lawyers will no doubt make legal argument out of the details, but those will be distinctions without much difference as far as the public interest is concerned.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.