Skip to content Skip to footer

Poll Finds Most Voters Disagree With Most Recent Anti-LGBTQ Decision From SCOTUS

The poll shows the unpopularity of the Supreme Court’s unprecedented anti-LGBTQ ruling last week.

Protesters gather in front of the Supreme Court of the United States on December 5, 2022, in Washington, D.C.

The majority of voters disagree with the outcome of the Supreme Court’s latest anti-LGBTQ ruling allowing businesses to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation, new polling finds.

According to a survey from Data for Progress released this week, 65 percent of likely voters say that businesses should not be allowed to deny services to people based on their race, religion, disability or sexual orientation. This includes 84 percent of Democrats and 66 percent of independents, as well as a plurality of Republicans, at 48 percent.

The poll’s results show the unpopularity of the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative v. Elenis last week, in which the Court’s conservative majority ruled in favor of a website designer’s entirely hypothetical argument that being forced to create a wedding website for a gay couple — something it appears she has never been asked to do — would constitute a violation of her First Amendment rights.

The decision is a major blow to the rights of LGBTQ people, who will now be open to discrimination from businesses that do any sort of creative work — discrimination that is, according to the far right Supreme Court, a right granted to business owners under the Constitution.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted in her dissent that it is the first time the Supreme Court has ruled that “a business open to the public [has] a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class.” LGBTQ advocates have spoken out against the ruling, raising alarm that the decision will usher in more forms of discrimination against LGBTQ people and, potentially, other marginalized populations.

The poll also found that granting rights to business owners should not be prioritized over the rights of people, despite the Supreme Court’s apparent view. Sixty-four percent of respondents said that the right of individuals to be served regardless of their race, religion, disability or sexual orientation should be prioritized over the right of business owners to refuse service.

This also held true when voters were asked specifically about their views on LGBTQ rights. A majority of respondents (52 percent) said that they disagree that business owners should be allowed to refuse services for same-sex marriages in particular, with 38 percent saying they “strongly” disagree.

This includes a strong majority of Democrats, at 76 percent, and 50 percent of independents. Only 30 percent of Republicans said they disagree with the statement — perhaps because of the right’s increasing attacks on the LGBTQ community.

Other polls have found that the GOP’s current attacks on LGBTQ rights are unpopular. Researchers have found that Republicans’ focus on attacking trans people and eroding LGBTQ rights could backfire as an electoral strategy. In March, Data for Progress found that 64 percent of voters say there is “too much” legislation targeting the rights of trans and gay people, while a Grinnell College poll found that nearly 60 percent of people believe bans on books discussing gender or sexual orientation are wrong.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 48 hours to add 242 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.