Washington – If the American people had a vote in picking a woman to put on the redesigned $10 bill, they would choose Eleanor Roosevelt, the nation’s longest-serving first lady who pushed for greater rights for women, blacks and Asians.
Nearly one in three registered voters chose Roosevelt, who has been called one of the most admired people of the 20th century, over a host of other women who played significant roles in United States history, according to a new McClatchy-Marist poll.
Abolitionist Harriet Tubman was second with 20 percent of voters, followed by Native American guide Sacagawea, pilot Amelia Earhart and suffragette Susan B. Anthony, who each received 11 percent. Just 4 percent chose Sandra Day O’Connor, the first female justice of the Supreme Court.
“They had a lot to do with building this country, as much as the men did. And still do,” said David Tedder, 62, of Douglasville, Ga.
Genevieve Payne, 62, a retiree who lives in Springfield, Mo., said she doesn’t see the need to change the money. The Obama administration announced in June that a woman will appear on the new $10 bill, marking the first time in more than a century that a female face will grace paper currency in the United States. Former first lady Martha Washington and Native American Pocahontas both had a place on bills in the 1800s, while Anthony and Sacagawea briefly adorned the $1 coin.
“It costs millions and millions of dollars,” she said. “I don’t see the need to spend the money. The economy is in such a bad position. It’s so trivial.”
The Treasury Department launched a public campaign to seek suggestions with a requirement that the woman be deceased. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew is expected to make a decision later this year. The redesigned bill will be unveiled in 2020 to celebrate the 100th anniversary of women’s right to vote.
Fifteen percent of those polled did not like the six choices provided, preferred another woman or were unsure who they would pick.
Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion in New York, which conducts the poll, said men are more undecided than women on the issue. Fourteen percent of male respondents are unsure of whose image should appear, while only 9 percent of women are.
“Men were less decided, suggesting there is an interest and knowledge gap,” he said.
The decision to add a woman to the $10 bill came after a campaign, “Women on 20s,” called for overhauling the $20 bill by replacing former President Andrew Jackson with a female face. Tubman came out on top of a list of 15 women after more than 600,000 people voted in an online poll. The $20 bill is not being changed.
Rodney Fox, 31, a postal carrier in Boise, Idaho, thinks Tubman or another black woman should be the $10, but he thinks that is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
Some $10 bills still may show the current face of Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first secretary of the treasury, who pushed for a national currency. Others may have a combination of two images.
Roosevelt came out on top of the McClatchy-Marist poll with men and women, all but one age group and people in all regions of the country. African-Americans, though, preferred Tubman by wide margins.
“We could just totally be done with that debate if we just put the personification of liberty on our money,” he said. “I think it would unite us and end some of these petty squabbles.”Tom Laney, 63, a retired teacher from Odessa, Texas, attributed the decision to put a woman on the bill to “political correctness.” He suggests putting the face of the Statue of Liberty on money instead.
SAMANTHA EHLINGER OF THE WASHINGTON BUREAU CONTRIBUTED.
METHODOLOGY
This survey of 1,249 adults was conducted July 22-28 by The Marist Poll sponsored and funded in partnership with McClatchy. Adults 18 and older residing in the continental United States were interviewed in English or Spanish by telephone using live interviewers. Landline telephone numbers were randomly selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the nation from ASDE Survey Sampler Inc. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. Respondents in the household were selected by asking for the youngest male. To increase coverage, this landline sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of cellphone numbers from Survey Sampling International. The two samples were then combined and balanced to reflect the 2013 American Community Survey one-year estimates for age, gender, income, race and region. Results are statistically significant within plus or minus 2.8 percentage points. There are 964 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within plus or minus 3.2 percentage points. The error margin was not adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 7 days to add 432 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.