Skip to content Skip to footer

Pennsylvania Democrats Sue GOP Over Their Attempt to “Investigate” 2020 Election

Democrats described the investigation as an unprecedented “ploy” to undermine the 2020 presidential election results.

Election personnel sort absentee ballot applications for storage at the Gwinnett County Board of Voter Registrations and Elections offices on November 7, 2020, in Lawrenceville, Georgia.

Pennsylvania Democrats in the state Senate have sued to block 17 subpoenas issued by Republican lawmakers who are seeking to conduct a so-called “forensic investigation” into the veracity of the 2020 presidential election.

Such an investigation — which some have described as an audit akin to one that was dubiously conducted in Arizona this year — is not necessary. Allegations of election fraud in last year’s presidential race have lacked any substance whatsoever, and dozens of courts, including some in Pennsylvania, have determined that no such fraud occurred.

Nevertheless, last Wednesday, state Senators in the Intergovernmental Operations Committee issued subpoenas requesting personal records of voters along a party-line vote, with seven Republicans voting to do so and four Democrats opposing the idea. Democrats promised to sue after the vote was held, alleging that the order violated the state constitution.

Per Pennsylvania law, the affirmation or contestation of election outcomes belongs to the judiciary alone, Democrats alleged in their suit.

“The investigation that the Committee seeks to undertake would be tantamount to an election contest and falls outside the authority of the General Assembly to regulate the holding of elections through enactment of legislation,” the lawsuit states.

Republicans, through their subpoenas, are requesting some highly personal information of voters who took part in the 2020 election, including the names of those who voted, their dates of birth, their addresses, drivers’ license numbers, and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers. Such details are likely to be shared with a third-party company contracted to conduct the supposed investigation.

“The latest ploy by the [Pennsylvania state] Senate Republicans is unprecedented and completely unwarranted,” Pennsylvania Democrats said in a statement regarding their lawsuit. “All aspects of the certified 2020 election have been thoroughly reviewed and adjudicated in the courts with no findings of irregularities or fraud.”

President Joe Biden defeated former President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania by a margin of 1.2 percent of the total ballots cast, amounting to a difference in ballot counts of 81,660 votes. In spite of Biden’s win, Trump maintained that he was the true winner in the state, citing unspecified voter fraud allegations that he and his allies were never able to substantiate with evidence of any kind. All 20 of the state’s Electoral College electors were assigned to Biden.

A July poll asked Pennsylvania residents whether they supported efforts to audit the 2020 election, like the one currently being promoted by State Senate Republicans. By a 14-point margin, respondents in that poll said that an audit on the election could not be trusted.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.