The publisher of The Washington Post announced Friday that the paper wouldn’t make an endorsement in the U.S. presidential race, with its newsroom reporting that the decision was made by billionaire owner Jeff Bezos, who intervened to stop a drafted endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee.
Publisher William Lewis wrote that the paper would return to its “roots” of not endorsing presidential candidates, which the paper didn’t do regularly until 1976. The decision came days after the Los Angeles Times owner, the billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong, also reportedly blocked a planned endorsement of Harris.
The Washington Post Guild, a union, condemned Bezos’ decision in a statement on social media, arguing that it was an abdication of responsibility and suggesting that “management interfered with our members in editorial.”
Karen Attiah, a Post columnist, called the decision an “an absolute stab in the back,” writing on social media.
“What an insult to those of us who have literally put our careers and lives on the line to call out threats to human rights and democracy,” she wrote.
Martin “Marty” Baron, a former executive editor at the Post who was lauded for his leadership of the paper from 2012 to 2021, also denounced the decision not to endorse a presidential candidate.
“This is cowardice, with democracy as its casualty. Donald Trump will see this as an invitation to further intimidate owner Jeff Bezos (and others),” he wrote on social media. “Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”
The Post has endorsed the Democratic nominee for president in every race since 1976, aside from 1988, when it made no endorsement. The Los Angeles Times didn’t issue endorsements for decades but has endorsed the Democrat in each of the past four presidential elections, starting in 2008.
Lewis said the Post would no longer make presidential endorsements and emphasized its commitment to independent, nonpartisan news. He cited editorial board decisions not to endorse in 1960 and 1972, which gave similar rationales.
Lewis was previously the publisher at The Wall Street Journal, which is owned by right-wing billionaire Rupert Murdoch. Lewis’ tenure at the Post, which began last year, has been plagued by controversy.
The reasons for Bezos’ reported intervention to stop a planned Harris endorsement are not clear, but he has told the paper’s leaders that he would like them to seek out more conservative readers and add more conservative opinion columnists, according to The New York Times.
Some observers have suggested that Bezos, the founder of Amazon, and Soon-Shiong, a biotech mogul, are afraid to antagonize Trump for fear he could retaliate against their businesses when in office.
“The most serious allegation… is that Soon-Shiong and Bezos are trying to hedge their bets out of fear that their business interests could be harmed during a second Trump presidency,” Columbia Journalism Review’s Sewall Chan, who has worked at both the Post and the Los Angeles Times, wrote on Friday.
“Soon-Shiong, who made his fortune as a biopharmaceutical innovator, is working on new drugs that would presumably require FDA approval,” Chan continued. “Amazon faces an antitrust lawsuit, brought last year by the Biden administration, that will take years to litigate or settle.”
Robert Kagan, a neoconservative columnist and editor at large at the Post, resigned in protest on Friday, Semafor reported, while suggesting there may be further resignations.
“People are shocked, furious, surprised,” an unnamed editorial board member told Semafor about the endorsement decision. “If you don’t have the balls to own a newspaper, don’t.”
Other major newspapers have endorsed Harris, including The Philadelphia Inquirer on Friday — with the reminder that “the road to the White House may well run through Pennsylvania and every vote matters.” Will Bunch, a columnist at the paper, wrote on social media that “unlike some other news organizations, we will not be silenced, not when everything is on the line for democracy.”
The New York Times endorsed Harris on September 30, calling Trump “morally unfit” and “temperamentally unfit” for office.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.