Skip to content Skip to footer

Oklahoma Republican’s Bill Would Fine Drag Performers $20K Over Shows for Kids

The proposal places “a target [on] drag performers,” one LGBTQ advocate said.

Rich Kuntz, also known as Gidget, reads to children during Drag Queen Story Hour on March 21, 2019.

A Republican lawmaker in the Oklahoma state legislature has proposed a bill that would criminalize certain drag performances that take place in public spaces.

The bill, authored by state Rep. Kevin West (R), wrongly claims that such performances are equivalent to 18-and-over entertainment, including adult dancing or situations where nudity is present. The bill’s text specifically singles out kid-friendly events that have no sexual connotations whatsoever — including the popular library reading program “Drag Queen Story Hour.”

West claims that the bill would still allow people to host drag performances in private areas. “It wouldn’t be allowed where just the general public would be able to see the performance. So like a library or a school or something like that would fall into being under the jurisdiction of this bill,” West told Business Insider.

But the bill’s parameters for what types of venues would be allowed to host drag shows are vague, including for G-rated performances where parents could voluntarily bring their children to be entertained.

“It shall be unlawful for a person to organize or authorize the viewing of a drag queen story hour on public property or in a location where the drag queen story hour could be viewed by a person who is a minor,” reads the bill, which is scheduled for a February 6 floor hearing in the Oklahoma state House of Representatives.

If the bill becomes law, private establishments like restaurants or bookstores could potentially be banned from hosting drag performances; those found in violation of the law would be subject to fines of up to $20,000 and could be imprisoned for as many as two years.

The bill is one of the latest legislative attacks on drag performers in statehouses across the country. Proposals that sexualize non-sexual drag events are part of a deeper line of attack on the greater LGBTQ community, wrote Washington Post gender and society columnist Monica Hesse last summer.

“The debate must be shifted ‘to sexualization,’ because without such a shift, there would be no debate,” Hesse said, adding that:

The uproar over such a sincerely wholesome event makes it plain what the issue really is: not parental rights. Not sexualization. Not the content of what the drag queens are reading to the kids. It’s the existence of drag queens. It’s the idea that someone might present in a way that was at odds with a certain vision of how men or women should dress or present or behave.

Nicole McAfee, executive director of Freedom Oklahoma, condemned the bill for placing a target on drag performers.

The bill would create “a situation that could put a lot of Oklahoma individual performers and small businesses out of business and create real harm in censoring expression of artists across the state,” McAfee said to Fox 25 in Oklahoma City.

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we only have hours left to raise over $9,000 in critical funds.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?