Skip to content Skip to footer

Oklahoma Republican’s Bill Would Fine Drag Performers $20K Over Shows for Kids

The proposal places “a target [on] drag performers,” one LGBTQ advocate said.

Rich Kuntz, also known as Gidget, reads to children during Drag Queen Story Hour on March 21, 2019.

Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation.

A Republican lawmaker in the Oklahoma state legislature has proposed a bill that would criminalize certain drag performances that take place in public spaces.

The bill, authored by state Rep. Kevin West (R), wrongly claims that such performances are equivalent to 18-and-over entertainment, including adult dancing or situations where nudity is present. The bill’s text specifically singles out kid-friendly events that have no sexual connotations whatsoever — including the popular library reading program “Drag Queen Story Hour.”

West claims that the bill would still allow people to host drag performances in private areas. “It wouldn’t be allowed where just the general public would be able to see the performance. So like a library or a school or something like that would fall into being under the jurisdiction of this bill,” West told Business Insider.

But the bill’s parameters for what types of venues would be allowed to host drag shows are vague, including for G-rated performances where parents could voluntarily bring their children to be entertained.

“It shall be unlawful for a person to organize or authorize the viewing of a drag queen story hour on public property or in a location where the drag queen story hour could be viewed by a person who is a minor,” reads the bill, which is scheduled for a February 6 floor hearing in the Oklahoma state House of Representatives.

If the bill becomes law, private establishments like restaurants or bookstores could potentially be banned from hosting drag performances; those found in violation of the law would be subject to fines of up to $20,000 and could be imprisoned for as many as two years.

The bill is one of the latest legislative attacks on drag performers in statehouses across the country. Proposals that sexualize non-sexual drag events are part of a deeper line of attack on the greater LGBTQ community, wrote Washington Post gender and society columnist Monica Hesse last summer.

“The debate must be shifted ‘to sexualization,’ because without such a shift, there would be no debate,” Hesse said, adding that:

The uproar over such a sincerely wholesome event makes it plain what the issue really is: not parental rights. Not sexualization. Not the content of what the drag queens are reading to the kids. It’s the existence of drag queens. It’s the idea that someone might present in a way that was at odds with a certain vision of how men or women should dress or present or behave.

Nicole McAfee, executive director of Freedom Oklahoma, condemned the bill for placing a target on drag performers.

The bill would create “a situation that could put a lot of Oklahoma individual performers and small businesses out of business and create real harm in censoring expression of artists across the state,” McAfee said to Fox 25 in Oklahoma City.

Important Message: Please Read

For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.

Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.

Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.

It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.

If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.