In early October, BP and its contractors Transocean and Halliburton, were cited by the Interior Department for their negligence in the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf last year.
According to the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), the companies have 60 days to file appeals before any penalties are imposed against them.
Also see: “Oil Spills Are Forever: Activists Fight to Hold Exxon Mobil Accountable in Alaska (Part One)“
The main voice opposing the “slap-on-the-wrist” measures against BP is US Rep. Edward Markey, who calls for stronger penalties. Under law, fines are capped at $35,000 a day, per incident for the violations, which Markey estimates to be just seven hours worth of BP's profits.
“That fine obviously does not even begin to approach the amount needed to be a deterrent against a repeat of this tragedy. That fine is a slap on the wrist,” Markey said.
However, the citation for BP appears to be more of a warning measure, as Michael Bromwich, head of the BSEE, also said that it wouldn't be appropriate to completely ban BP from offshore drilling.
“The question is, 'Do you administer the administrative death penalty based on one incident?' and we've concluded that's not appropriate,” Bromwich said.
Incidentally, just last week, the Department of the Interior gave its first approval of a Gulf oil exploration plan submitted by BP.
Furthermore, the same agency responsible for issuing drilling permits to BP, the BSEE, has also allowed BP to participate in an upcoming oil lease auction for the Gulf in December.
Deepwater Horizon Disaster's Lingering Effects
It has been a year and a half since the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, yet the effects of the environmental disaster are still being felt – both by the nonhuman ecosystems directly affected and by coastal residents who depend on the waters for their livelihoods.
According to a recent report in The New York Times, shrimpers in southeastern Louisiana have called this year's white shrimp season the “worst in memory,” with some fishermen claiming an 80 percent loss this year.
While the poor shrimping season has been attributed to many factors, research at Louisiana State University (LSU) points to lingering effects of the BP oil spill. Joris L. van der Ham, a researcher at LSU, said his findings are not yet complete, but suggest that compounds in the oil may have stunted the shrimp's growth rate.
Another recent study put out by the same university finds that certain fish species in the Gulf that have been exposed to the oil have shown signs of cellular damage that could impair reproduction.
Furthermore, low doses of the toxic oil compounds can have longer-lasting effects, which may take months or even years to manifest themselves, as we saw with the herring fishing collapse four years after the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, which to this day remains debated as a definitive cause of the species collapse.
Government and industry officials have repeatedly come out with reports that find the seafood in the Gulf “safe to eat.” However, a recent study by the journal Environmental Health Perspectives found that the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) quick reassurance of Gulf seafood safety was based on flawed analysis, leading to human consumption of seafood contaminated by as much as 10,000 times the FDA-approved “safe” level of toxicity.
Miriam Rotkin-Ellman, a staff scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council and co-author of the study, acknowledged two areas of concern: the accumulation of the contaminants within the tissue of the shrimp and the effects the toxics have on the affected species for both survival and reproduction. Both factors appear to come into play when it comes to health implications for consumers of the seafood.
“It is difficult to say how long the contamination will last,” Rotkin-Ellman said. “The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) could take ten years to break down.”
She avers that even though the BP oil spill is unprecedented in the Gulf, the science is available that can effectively study and monitor the effects of the spill on the ecosystem. She also said that this erroneous information from the FDA is not an anomaly.
“The FDA shows a pattern of flawed regulation; it turns a blind eye to contamination and chemicals in many foods and consumer products, from pesticides to hormones to additives,” Rotkin-Ellman said.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 300 new monthly donors in the next 4 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy