Skip to content Skip to footer

New Vaccine Is So Far 100 Percent Effective at Preventing Hospitalization

Johnson & Johnson announced Friday that its vaccine is 66 percent effective at preventing moderate to severe infection.

People wait outside a COVID-19 vaccine distribution center at the Kedren Community Health Center on January 28, 2021, in Los Angeles, California.

Johnson & Johnson announced on Friday that its COVID-19 vaccine is 85 percent effective against severe COVID-19 infections, and no study participants who received the vaccine died or had to be hospitalized.

The results also show that the vaccine is 66 percent effective at preventing moderate to severe infection. The trials were conducted globally, and the vaccine was 72 percent effective at preventing moderate to severe infection in the U.S., 66 in Latin America and 57 percent in South Africa. These results were generally consistent across age and race, the company says.

In South Africa, 95 percent of the infections were due to the new, more transmissible variant of the virus. Some officials have said that this strain is more resistant to antibody treatments. So far, two cases of this strain have been identified in the U.S.

The vaccine could be authorized for use as early as mid-February, with Johnson & Johnson saying that it plans to apply for emergency authorization of the vaccine from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) next week. The FDA has said that it will consider vaccines that are above 50 percent efficacy, and the Johnson & Johnson one exceeds that threshold.

The U.S. agreed last summer to purchase 100 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine had it proved effective.

Though this vaccine is less effective than those developed by Moderna and Pfizer, the trial results are still promising — as some point out, annual flu vaccines are only about 40 to 60 percent effective. Its ability to prevent hospitalization and death at a 100 percent success rate is crucial, and though the prevention of moderate infection varied across regions, the 85 percent prevention of severe infection was consistent worldwide.

One distinguishing factor between the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and the ones by Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech is that it requires only one shot to be effective, while the others are a two-shot regimen. This could free up appointments for vaccine administers, allowing more people to get vaccinated once supply issues are fixed.

“A one-shot vaccine is considered by the World Health Organization to be the best option in pandemic settings, enhancing access, distribution and compliance. Eighty-five percent efficacy in preventing severe COVID-19 disease and prevention of COVID-19-related medical interventions will potentially protect hundreds of millions of people from serious and fatal outcomes of COVID-19,” said Paul Stoffels, chief scientific officer at Johnson & Johnson, in a statement. “It also offers the hope of helping ease the huge burden placed on healthcare systems and communities.”

Another compelling factor of the new vaccine is that it is much easier to store and transport; the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have posed huge logistical challenges as they need to be stored at minus 70 and minus 20 degrees Celsius, respectively. In some places, improper storage has led vaccines to be thrown away. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine, on the other hand, can be stored at standard refrigerator temperatures for up to three months.

“Changing the trajectory of the pandemic will require mass vaccination to create herd immunity, and a single-dose regimen with fast onset of protection and ease of delivery and storage provides a potential solution to reaching as many people as possible,” said Mathai Mammen, the company’s global head of research and development. “The ability to avoid hospitalizations and deaths would change the game in combating the pandemic.”

Unlike the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which are a new type of vaccine that operate using genetic material called mRNA, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses a weakened version of the common cold to carry DNA into the body that helps the immune system recognize and fight the virus.

White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci has said that, with new strains of the virus emerging globally, now is the time to get as many vaccines administered as possible to quash the chances of mutant strains becoming dominant. Mass vaccination could also prevent the emergence of new strains.

Fauci also said earlier this week that, while there is currently no official guidance recommending that people wear two masks, it “makes common sense” to do so to prevent infection.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.