Skip to content Skip to footer
Mortgage Foreclosures Still Swamping Federal Efforts to Help
Washington - Banks and other lenders are still foreclosing on Americans' homes at a rate that's outpacing the Obama administration's main effort to stem the crisis. In fact

Mortgage Foreclosures Still Swamping Federal Efforts to Help

Washington - Banks and other lenders are still foreclosing on Americans' homes at a rate that's outpacing the Obama administration's main effort to stem the crisis. In fact

Washington – Banks and other lenders are still foreclosing on Americans’ homes at a rate that’s outpacing the Obama administration’s main effort to stem the crisis.

In fact, while the Treasury Department’s Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, has started the mortgage modification process on almost 760,000 homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes, less than 5 percent of those workouts have become permanent, government data show.

“HAMP has made only limited progress for nine months now, and the residential foreclosure crisis continues to mount,” said Richard Neiman, the superintendent of banks in New York state and a member of the Congressional Oversight Panel that was formed to monitor the Treasury bank bailout funds that support the mortgage program. He was appointed to the post by the Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives.

Another member of the oversight panel, U.S. Rep. Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican and a critic of the bailout bill, called the mortgage program “a failure.”

In a recent report, he said the administration’s efforts “have assisted only a small number of homeowners while drawing billions of involuntary taxpayer dollars into a black hole.” (Hensarling recently left the panel.)

The Treasury Department acknowledges that its program needs to do a better job of making hundreds of thousands of trial modifications permanent, but an official said the program is making progress and is on track to meet many of its goals.

“I think that if you go back and look at what we said we would do in February, we are on track to meet the president’s goals,” said Michael Barr, an assistant Treasury secretary who helps oversee the nation’s main modification program. “We are not going to be able to prevent every foreclosure in the country.”

More than 5 million mortgages have been caught in foreclosure proceedings since the economy began slipping in 2007, and an estimated 8 million to 13 million more could follow in the next five years. The Treasury’s goal is to help modify 3 million to 4 million mortgages in three years, but only about 1 percent of that number have completed the process.

The Treasury program could spend as much as $75 billion helping homeowners avoid foreclosure. The program seeks to pay three parties — the company that services a loan, the bank or investor that owns the loan and the homeowner — if they rearrange the mortgage so the homeowner’s monthly payment is more manageable.

One of the central problems, the administration and its critics agree, is the slow pace of finalizing the modifications it’s started.

Under the program, mortgage servicers — companies that collect monthly mortgage checks and pay the bank, property tax and insurance — arrange the modifications.

Through November, the Treasury Department said that more than 3 million homeowners had been sent information on potential modifications, and that 1 million of them had been offered modifications.

Of those, 759,058 trial modifications have been started — but just 31,382 have been finalized into what Treasury calls “permanent modifications.”

Part of that low conversion rate is to be expected because a modification’s trial period is three months long. If a homeowner remains current on his or her payments and provides all the necessary documents, then the modification can become permanent. A trial modification that started in October, for example, wouldn’t become permanent until January.

However, the conversion rate is low even for trial modifications that have been under way for more than three months.

As of Oct. 31, only 4.7 percent of the modifications that had been on the books for at least three months had become permanent, according to the Congressional Oversight Panel.

While that doesn’t mean that more than 95 percent of trial modifications begun three months or more earlier “are failures,” in the panel’s words, it does mean that the “vast majority” of trial modifications failed to convert on the schedule that the Treasury originally announced.

Treasury’s Barr said that mortgage servicers — some them stand-alone companies, others units of big Wall Street banks — simply aren’t doing enough to move homeowners from trial to permanent modifications.

While most homeowners are making their payments once they’re in a trial modification and the basic structure of the program is working, more needs to be done to push mortgage servicers to close deals, he said.

“It sounds really boring, but it is basic execution on the ground,” Barr said. “They started to ramp up in the spring, and they have not done a good enough job to get the documents in that need to come in.”

In part, that’s because mortgage service companies generally haven’t been set up to execute wide-scale mortgage modifications. Mortgage servicers historically have been highly automated — more akin to collection agents than to loan officers, and they’ve needed to change their business model, hire staff and rethink how they interact with customers, a process that’s been slow.

“The servicers need to do a better job,” said Tom Miller, the attorney general of Iowa and a leader in state-level efforts to help desperate homeowners. “They have to make sure they have the full staff, make sure they are trained, make sure they don’t make people wait and wait and wait. We have a tendency to accept the wait, and we shouldn’t.”

Faith Schwartz, the executive director of an industry foreclosure-prevention group called the Hope Now Alliance, said mortgage servicers have made a “huge investment in staffing and technology,” and that much of the past year has been spent learning and adapting to the Treasury’s new program.

“My impression is everything that gets done from here on is going to be much better than what was done a year ago,” she said. In a few months, she said, many of the modification statistics will better reflect that.

Miller also said that mortgage companies need to reduce the principal on some of their loans in order to prevent more foreclosures. That could mean, for example, reducing the balance owned on a $200,000 home to, say, $180,000 if the home’s value has dropped substantially. That, he said, was one of the tricks that helped his state emerge from a severe farm crisis two decades ago.

“We saw this movie before in Iowa in the 1980s, and modifications are what saved rural Iowa,” he said. “Many of them were premised on reduced principal.”

In the third quarter of 2009, nearly a quarter of single-family homeowners with mortgages owed more than their homes were worth, the Congressional Oversight Panel said. The Treasury’s program does little to reduce mortgage principals, the panel said, adding that “as currently structured,” the Treasury program “appears capable of preventing only a fraction of foreclosures.”

Banks and other lenders are still foreclosing on Americans’ homes at a rate that’s outpacing the Obama administration’s main effort to stem the crisis.

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?