Natural hair braider Ashley N’Dakpri knows her knots. She practiced as a child on friends and family, attended beauty school in the Ivory Coast, and has 20 years of professional experience in the United States. Yet that’s not enough in Louisiana.
The Louisiana Board of Cosmetology requires braiders to spend a year or more in a state-licensed school, whether they need the training or not. This works well for industry insiders on the board, composed of beauty school owners and licensed cosmetologists. They have financial interests in forced schooling and high barriers to market entry.
Meanwhile, people like N’Dakpri are stuck on the outside looking in. She has received multiple citations for operating Afro Touch Hair Braiding, a state-licensed salon in Gretna, Louisiana, without also having state-issued credentials for herself and her employees. Braiders who want to avoid fines must either earn a cosmetology license or an alternative hair design permit, which requires at least 500 hours of formal training, mostly covering conventional cosmetology techniques that braiders do not use.
Besides being largely irrelevant, alternative hair design programs are expensive and hard to find. They are also remedial for experts like N’Dakpri. If anything, she should be teaching classes, not paying to sit behind a desk or work for free in a student salon, owned by the very people who want to put her there.
Louisiana braiders can get around the requirement by moving to any bordering state. Arkansas, Mississippi and Texas allow braiders to work without government permission, which makes sense considering the occupation involves no cutting, dyeing or heat — or anything realistically dangerous.
N’Dakpri could also switch careers, sacrificing an essential part of her cultural identity.
Natural hair braiding has distinct historical and racial roots, originating centuries ago in West Africa. People from the region, especially women, regularly learn the craft as children or teens. “I don’t understand why I need to get a license to braid hair, when I’ve been doing so for happy customers for years,” N’Dakpri says.
Policing Black hair is nothing new. As far back as 1786, Louisiana passed the Tignon Laws, which forced Black and biracial women to cover their hair in public. Other states adopted their own forms of hair discrimination. California and New York responded in 2019 with reforms that allow people to wear or treat their hair however they desire without reprisal. Yet people cannot hire whoever they want to braid hair in many places. Natural hair braiders still face regulatory hurdles in 17 states and Washington, D.C.
N’Dakpri decided to fight back. So in 2019, she filed a lawsuit in state court to invalidate Louisiana’s regulatory scheme. Our public interest law firm, the Institute for Justice, represents her and her aunt, Afro Touch founder Lynn Schofield.
The women make a simple argument: People have a right to earn an honest living in their chosen occupation without moving far away or paying thousands of dollars for skills they already possess. Most people would agree, but not the judge. On July 12, 2023, he dismissed their case, deferring to the board’s rulemaking authority.
The decision hinges on a judge-made doctrine called “rational basis review,” which courts have been using to excuse regulatory overreach since 1938. All the government has to do to survive rational basis review is articulate a legitimate state interest for meddling. No evidence is necessary that regulations achieve their intended purpose. Judges accept speculation, good intentions and after-the-fact rationalizations.
The idea is to protect separation of powers. Courts want to give the legislative and executive branches latitude, so judges become extremely deferential. Soon nobody in government is accountable to the constitution. Judges have used rational basis review to affirm “unjust,” “unfair,” “unwise” and “foolish” laws. The U.S. Supreme Court even allows “stupid laws.” This is a problem.
Almost anything goes as long as laws do not infringe on rights courts deem “fundamental.” These include things like free speech, voting and marriage, which get a higher degree of scrutiny. Providing for your family does not make the cut. Louisiana and other states acknowledge this right exists but put it in a lower tier and refuse to protect it with rigor.
Rather than give up, N’Dakpri and her aunt will appeal in the coming months and push forward to the Louisiana Supreme Court, if necessary. They can look to the brothers of Saint Joseph Abbey for inspiration. These monks, based at a monastery in Covington, Louisiana, took on rational basis review and won in 2013.
Their case started when they announced plans to sell handcrafted caskets without state permission. The Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors threatened them with criminal fines if they did not first obtain a funeral director license. This made little sense, considering the monks had no interest in being funeral directors.
They sued in federal court to overturn the licensing requirement and prevailed at the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. “The great deference due state economic regulation does not demand judicial blindness,” a unanimous panel of judges held. Although rare, other victories have followed. Texas eyebrow threaders, Pennsylvania property managers and Georgia lactation consultants have all overcome rational basis reviews.
Louisiana braiders hope to be next. Their case matters, and not just for employees and customers. Anyone who works to pay rent or buy groceries should be concerned. If regulators can come after lower-income professionals at safe, responsible businesses like Afro Touch, they can turn anyone into a criminal.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 9 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.