Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a quick donation.
Washington – The White House, congressional leaders and union officials on Thursday announced a tentative agreement in their health care negotiations, to pare back a proposed excise tax on high-end insurance policies for middle-class workers.
The compromise could break a deadlock in the health care debate — if enough lawmakers agree to it. Many details were unresolved, however — everything from how much the pared back tax would cost, to how a government health care exchange that collective bargaining units and employers might buy into over time would be structured.
Lawmakers hoped to finish negotiating an overhaul plan this weekend.
They agreed Thursday to significantly alter the original 40 percent tax contained in legislation the Senate passed Dec. 24 that would tax policies that cost more than $8,500 for individuals and $23,000 for families.
Under the agreement, the threshold for taxation would be adjusted based on companies’ or unions’ relative age, gender and ratio of workers in high-risk jobs. Dental and vision coverage would be exempt.
It also would give collective bargaining units a five-year delay before they’re subject to the excise tax. Over time, more Americans could get their insurance through a government-managed private insurance exchange, especially if they live in states with high insurance costs or participate in collective bargaining units.
The aim, as union bosses see it, is to tax high-end health insurance plans carried by wealthy business executives while shielding middle-class workers who bargained away their salaries in exchange for high-end health-care coverage.
Details, though, were sketchy. No firm cost estimate was available. The Senate plan would have raised an estimated $149 billion over 10 years.
Nor was it clear how they’d find the lost revenue. President Barack Obama has insisted on a plan that doesn’t increase deficits over a 10 years period; the Senate bill would cut deficits an estimated $132 billion.
House of Representatives leaders suggested that they could make further increases in the Medicare tax, now 1.45 percent. The Senate would boost that by 0.9 percentage points for individuals who make more than $200,000 and joint filers who make more than $250,000. House leaders are considering a bigger increase.
Some other key differences between the House and Senate version of health care legislation also remain unresolved, including abortion funding, a government-run health care plan and whether health exchanges, or marketplaces where consumers can shop for coverage, will operate largely on a state or national basis.
The House agreed to a government-run public option that would compete with the private sector, while the Senate prefers a federally-supervised system of multi-state, privately-run companies.
The tax issue is thus far the lone major breakthrough, as Obama and Democratic leaders were willing to pivot at the urging of one of their biggest bases, organized labor, even if it meant slowing the rate at which the plan the plan might ostensibly pay for itself.
“The president’s pleased with this agreement,” said White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer. “He was very clear that we cannot do health care on the backs of the middle class, and I think this agreement achieves that.”
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.