Skip to content Skip to footer

Kevin McCarthy Backs Trump Loyalists’ Efforts to Expunge His 2 Impeachments

The Constitution does not provide a mechanism for expunging past impeachments, or even say that it’s possible.

Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy speaks in Statuary Hall at the U.S. Capitol on June 21, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-California) has expressed support for GOP efforts in Congress to “expunge” former President Donald Trump’s two impeachments from his time in office, even though there isn’t any constitutional mechanism to do so.

An impeachment in the House of Representatives of a federal official is a list of formal charges against that person, which the Senate must then consider within a trial, where each member of the “upper house” acts like a member of the jury. For a president to be indicted in that trial, two-thirds of senators must vote in the affirmative.

Trump never reached that threshold, though in his second impeachment, just after the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, a bipartisan majority of senators did vote to indict him.

Trump’s first impeachment was over his attempt to coerce Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, where he demanded political dirt on Joe Biden before the 2020 presidential campaign began, in exchange for U.S. support to defend against expected Russian encroachments.

A number of Trump loyalists in the House are looking to remove from the record his two impeachments. On Friday, McCarthy expressed support for doing so as well.

“I think it is appropriate. Just as I thought before — that you should expunge it, because it never should have gone through,” he told reporters.

Although McCarthy said in the days after the January 6 attack that Trump “bears responsibility” for what happened, he has since taken to defending Trump’s actions, vastly downplaying his previous comments.

Noah Bookbinder, president of the nonprofit government watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), took note of McCarthy’s comments on Tuesday, stating that they didn’t make sense from a legal standpoint.

“Let’s talk for a moment about this business of expunging Donald Trump’s impeachment,” Bookbinder wrote on Twitter, … “constitutionally, it doesn’t mean anything” he added.

“The House can hold a vote, sure, but it doesn’t change the fact that Trump was impeached, twice, and the Senate held trials,” Bookbinder said.

Indeed, the U.S. Constitution lays out the method and conditions for impeaching federal officials and the president, but it doesn’t say how — or even if — impeachments can be expunged from the official record.

“… let’s be clear,” Bookbinder went on to say, “that the only purpose of such a vote is to cover for Trump and to downplay the severity of an effort to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power and to overturn a free and fair election, resulting in violent insurrection.”

“Anyone who votes to ‘expunge the impeachment’ is voting to endorse an attack on democracy and to disempower American voters,” Bookbinder concluded.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.