Skip to content Skip to footer

Judge Blocks “Categorically Unconstitutional” Anti-Abortion Law in Arkansas

The Arkansas law would only allow abortions for people who had health risks during their pregnancy.

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked an Arkansas law, set to go into effect next week, that would have banned nearly all abortions in the state.

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker issued a preliminary injunction on the law, passed earlier this year by the GOP-controlled Arkansas legislature and signed by Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R-Arkansas), blocking its enforcement while she hears challenges to its constitutionality. In her explanation on why she was temporarily restricting the law from being enforced, Baker made clear how she might eventually rule on it, describing the new rules on abortion that were set to go into effect in Arkansas as “categorically unconstitutional.”

“Since the record at this stage of the proceedings indicates that women seeking abortions in Arkansas face an imminent threat to their constitutional rights, the Court concludes that they will suffer irreparable harm without injunctive relief,” Baker wrote.

The law, which would have been enforced starting July 28, would have made it a felony crime for any person to perform or attempt to perform an abortion in the state, except in medical emergencies for the person who was pregnant. The punishment for violating the law would be up to 10 years in prison.

The law would have left little recourse for those who wanted to get an abortion in the state, making no exceptions for allowing the procedure except where a pregnant person’s health was at risk.

In a statement praising the decision by Judge Baker to issue a preliminary injunction, Meagan Burrows, a staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union Reproductive Freedom Project said that the Arkansas law was in violation of court precedents set on abortion.

“Arkansas pursued a clearly unconstitutional law that would disproportionately harm people of color, people who live in rural areas, and people with low incomes — all of whom already face significant barriers to accessing health care and higher risks of pregnancy-related death,” Burrows said. “The court’s ruling today should serve as a stark reminder to anti-abortion politicians in Arkansas and other states that they cannot strip people of their right to make the deeply personal decision about whether to have an abortion or continue a pregnancy.”

In a post from its Twitter account, Planned Parenthood also hailed the decision.

“Every person has a constitutionally protected right to access abortion care, including from trusted medical providers in Arkansas,” the organization said. “Access to health care is a basic human right, and every person deserves care that gives them control over their own bodies, lives, and futures.”

While Baker’s ruling halts new restrictions in Arkansas, many other challenges elsewhere are ongoing, as several state legislatures across the country, emboldened with hopes that conservative justices appointed to the Supreme Court by former President Donald Trump could overturn Roe v. Wade, the Court’s decision in 1973 that protected the right to abortion throughout the U.S.

The Supreme Court itself has already agreed to take a case on one state’s restrictions. The Court will hear deliberations later this year on an anti-abortion law in Mississippi, which bans the practice after 15 weeks of a person being pregnant. Many abortion rights activists are deeply concerned that the Supreme Court could greatly weaken the protections held in Roe v. Wade, or overturn that ruling altogether, due to the current 6-3 conservative makeup of justices.

“The consequences of a Roe reversal would be devastating. Over 20 states would prohibit abortion outright,” Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement earlier this year about the Court’s decision to hear the case.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy