United States Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, is urging GOP legislators in his home state to continue fighting against a federal court ruling that the state’s congressional maps are unconstitutional and violate the voting rights of Black residents.
That court order, which was upheld by an appellate court in November, requires the legislature to redraw its maps to create two Black majority districts within the state’s six districts. Currently, only one of the state’s districts has a Black majority.
Two Black districts would be more in line with the overall demographics of the state, as nearly a third of Louisianans are Black, according to census figures.
The case is similar to one that was litigated in Alabama, where state Republican lawmakers failed to win on appeals the right to continue disenfranchising Black voters. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected — twice — efforts by Alabama officials to overturn a federal judge’s calls for lawmakers to draw an additional majority Black district.
It’s highly unlikely that Republicans’ attempts to reject the federal and appellate courts’ rulings will play out differently in Louisiana. However, Johnson wants lawmakers to continue stonewalling the process of redrawing maps, likely because it will result in a district that will flip control of one seat from Republicans to Democrats.
On Tuesday, Johnson vented his frustrations with a map that would comply with judicial orders that was recently proposed by Louisiana lawmakers.
“We’ve just seen, and are very concerned with, the proposed Congressional map presented in the Louisiana Legislature,” Johnson wrote on X. “It remains my position that the existing map is constitutional and that the legal challenge to it should be tried on merits so the State has adequate opportunity to defend its merits.”
If the state fails in the judiciary to overturn the federal court order, one of the “multiple other map options that are legally compliant” should be considered, Johnson added. Of course, Johnson’s definition of “legally compliant” is circumspect, given that he believes the current maps are legal.
Johnson is likely concerned that a new Black majority district will narrow Republicans’ already slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, as Black voters tend to support Democrats over Republicans. Currently, Republicans can only afford to lose a net of four congressional seats in order to maintain their majority.
With two additional Black majority seats in Alabama and Louisiana — as well as court orders in other states finding maps drawn by Republican state legislatures unlawful — it’s possible that a dozen or more seats across six separate states could flip to Democrats in the 2024 elections. Republicans will have to make up the difference in races elsewhere, an incredibly lofty goal.
Political observers condemned Johnson’s efforts to continue disenfranchising Black voters by demanding the state legislature stand firm against federal court orders.
“Black voters in Louisiana deserve a fair say in who represents them in Washington,” the account for Let America Vote, a voting rights organization, wrote on X. “Mike Johnson, the architect of election denialism, thinks otherwise.”
Civil rights lawyer Leslie Proll, also writing on X, compared Johnson’s demands to those of southern lawmakers who refused to comply with Supreme Court rulings during the Civil Rights movement.
“Brown v. Board was decided 70 years ago & was followed by massive resistance to compliance w/federal court orders,” Proll wrote. “Yet here we are w/none other than Speaker of House urging LA legislators to defy court order to create another Black congressional district.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.