Members of the Congressional Freethought Caucus (CFC), a collection of 20 lawmakers in Congress who seek to “protect the secular character of our government by adhering to the strict Constitutional principle of the separation of church and state,” released a white paper report on Wednesday showcasing Speaker of the House Mike Johnson’s (R-Louisiana) disturbing Christian nationalist views.
The report includes insights into how Johnson has tried to integrate his far right Christian views into government and public spheres — and highlights how Johnson, a then-relatively unknown lawmaker, played an instrumental role in trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election in order to keep former President Donald Trump in the White House.
In remarks about the report on Wednesday, caucus co-chair Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California) noted that, while Trump was largely responsible for the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, “Christian nationalism was [also] there in a big way.”
The two entities are closely aligned, Huffman went on.
“The Trump presidency gave the Christian nationalists sort of rocket fuel,” Huffman said. “They tasted power, they want more of it, and although Trump is gone, they now have one of their own as the speaker of the House.”
Huffman then explained the difference between people with Christian views and those who push for Christian nationalism:
I really want to underscore the violence [associated with Christian nationalism]. No one should confuse the Christian nationalist movement…as just a bunch of people of faith that want to practice their faith. It is the opposite of that. These are people who want power and control over others. They want to take over our government. They want to eliminate the separation of church and state and impose a biblically sanctioned theocracy.
Christian nationalists, including Johnson, “are zeroed in on defeating democracy,” Huffman added. “Violence is a feature, not a bug, of this movement and we need to take it very, very seriously.”
The CFC’s report recognizes that it’s “the right of every American,” including Mike Johnson, “to freely practice [their] faith as guaranteed by the First Amendment.” But it also showcases Johnson’s troubling Christian nationalist beliefs.
After he won the speakership, and following reports that Johnson doesn’t agree with the long-established tenet of a separation between church and state, the CFC invited Johnson to discuss his viewpoints with them in November, which the speaker declined. Because he wouldn’t meet with them in person, the caucus said it had “no choice but to undertake our own investigation of his pronouncements and actions to better understand his public program.”
The CFC’s findings were alarming.
“Speaker Johnson is deeply connected in political practice and philosophy to Christian Nationalism, more so than any other Speaker in American history,” the report states. “He has spent decades working to deny, reject, and undermine the constitutional separation of church and state, including trafficking in fake histories about our nation’s founding.”
Johnson has, for example, openly expressed a very narrow view of the “Establishment Clause” of the First Amendment to the Constitution. That clause, combined with legal rulings since its inception, bars any government endorsement of religion and forbids the use of federal resources to support religious goals. To Johnson, however, the Establishment Clause does “nothing more than prevent the state from establishing an official religion,” the report states, a viewpoint that is an “outdated interpretation of the First Amendment cuts against decades of First Amendment case law.”
Other examples of Johnson’s far right views abound in the report, including his desire to use public resources, including public education, to promote evangelical Christianity. The report also delves into his promotion of repressive anti-immigrant policies and his past calls to deny people civil rights based on his religious views — including LGBTQ rights, reproductive rights and the right of people to obtain divorces.
The report showcases Johnson’s actions after the 2020 presidential election in great detail, highlighting that he was an instrumental player in the GOP-MAGA-aligned congressional legal effort to keep Trump in office and overturn President Joe Biden’s rightful win.
The report also describes how Johnson has worked closely with a coalition of religious activists called the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). The “shadowy movement,” as it’s been described by The New Republic, is a growing influence in Republican circles, and promotes extremist calls for Christians to “conquer” and “take dominion” over “key mountains of society,” including business realms, the media and governments. In the weeks leading up to the Capitol attack, NAR leaders called for nationwide and global prayers for so-called “election integrity,” and “implored Christians to…mobilize for Trump’s reinstatement as president,” the CFC’s report states.
The report notes that Johnson took part in the prayer campaign and that he’s worked closely with individuals aligned with the movement in the past. Johnson has said that NAR has had a “profound influence” on his life, the CFC report states.
The report concludes by reemphasizing that the caucus “respects the central role” that religion plays in the lives of millions of Americans, including Johnson.
“But we must be clear-eyed about Speaker Johnson’s public record: he has dedicated his career as a lawyer, advocate, and legislator to undermining…constitutional freedoms, weakening the separation of church and state, and trying to impose his own radical religious views on other citizens,” the CFC white paper report says.
The report includes details on Johnson that Americans may not have been aware of, as his relative anonymity likely played a role in his rise to the rank of speaker in late October. Since Johnson’s ascension to the position that is second in line to the presidency, however, a multitude of reports have shone light on his far right ties.
Johnson, has, for example, served as a former counsel and senior spokesperson for the hate group Alliance Defending Freedom. He also wrote the forward to a conspiracy theory-laden book that included baseless claims that Chief Justice John Roberts was blackmailed into siding with liberals in key Supreme Court cases, and promoted the “Pizzagate” hoax that falsely alleged that high-ranking Democrats were involved in a sexual “blood cult” involving children at a restaurant in the D.C. area. Shortly after becoming speaker, Johnson urged “prayer” alone in response to a mass shooting, and in the past has blamed “secularization” for similar massacres.
A poll published in early November revealed that most Americans didn’t know enough about Johnson to formulate an opinion on him. However, that same poll found strong opposition to Johnson’s past policy stances — including majority opposition to his staunch anti-abortion positions, his belief that states should be allowed to imprison LGBTQ people for having consensual sexual relationships, and his statements of support for allowing insurance companies to deny coverage based on preexisting medical conditions.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.